《Table 2 The proportion (and number) of forest plots from three river gorges assigned to different v

  提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式

本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现

《Using classification assignment rules to assess land-use change impacts on forest biodiversity at local-to-national scales》

1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录

1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

Vegetation associations are as defined by Wiser and De Cáceres（2013）.The value for the gorge where the association was most frequent is indicated in bold.Associations are ordered by descending frequency in the Mokihinui lower gorge，Mokihinui upper gorg

Across the Mokihinui lower and upper gorges a total of eight alliances defined by the national classification were observed（Table 1，Fig.2a）.Of these，two alliances，Melicytus ramiflorus–Cyathea smithii forest（A:Bl PF2）and Cyathea dealbata–Melicytus ramiflorus forest（A:Bl PF4），were only recorded in the Mokihinui lower gorge but were uncommon（Fig.2a）.Four alliances，Lophozonia menziesii–Weinmannia racemosa forest（A:BBl F3），Pseudowintera colorata–Griselinia littoralis forest（A:BBl PF2），Fuscospora truncata–Weinmannia racemosa forest（A:BF6），and Pseudowintera colorata–Fuchsia excorticata（A:Bl PF5），were only found in the Mokihinui upper gorge.Two alliances，Weinmannia racemosa–Cyathea smithii forest（A:BBl PF3）and Weinmannia racemosa–Prumnopitys ferruginea forest（A:Bl PF1），were present in both the Mokihinui lower and upper gorges；notably these were the two alliancesthathadbothpodocarpspeciesand Weinmannia racemosa as dominants（Table 1）.The most common alliance in the Mokihinui lower gorge was Weinmannia racemosa–Cyatheasmithii forest（A:BBl PF3；56%of plots）and in the Mokihinui upper gorge was Lophozonia menziesii–Weinmannia racemosa forest（A:BBl F3；45%of plots）.