《Table 1 The proportion (and number) of forest plots from three river gorges assigned to different v

  提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式

本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现

《Using classification assignment rules to assess land-use change impacts on forest biodiversity at local-to-national scales》

1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录

1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

Vegetation alliances are as defined by Wiser et al.（2011）and Wiser and De Cáceres（2013）.The value for the gorge where the alliance was most frequent is indicated in bold.Alliances are ordered by descending frequency in the Mokihinui lower gorge，Mokih

Across the Mokihinui and Karamea lower gorges a total of seven alliances defined by the national classification were observed（Table 1，Fig.3a）.The most common alliance in the lower gorge of Karamea was Weinmannia racemosa–Cyathea smithii forest（A:BBl PF3；44%of plots），similar to its high frequency in the Mokihinui lower gorge.One alliance，the Cyathea dealbata–Melicytus ramiflorus forest（A:Bl PF4），was only recorded from the Mokihinui lower gorge，where it was uncommon.Three alliances，Lophozonia menziesii–Weinmannia racemosa forest（A:BBl F3），Fuscospora truncata–Weinmannia racemosa forest（A:BF6），and Beilschmiedia tawa–Weinmannia racemosa forest（A:Bl PF3），were present in the Karamea lower gorge but absent from the Mokihinui lower gorge.Three alliances，Weinmannia racemosa–Cyathea smithii forest（A:BBl PF3），Weinmannia racemosa–Prumnopitys ferruginea forest（A:Bl PF1），and Melicytus ramiflorus–Cyathea smithii forest（A:Bl PF2），were present in both Mokihinui and Karamea lower gorges（Table 1）.