《Table 3 Total fixed cost (USD) for the experiment》

《Table 3 Total fixed cost (USD) for the experiment》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《"Weed growth, herbicide efficacy, and rice productivity in dry seeded paddy field under different wheat stubble management methods"》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

Net field benefits were calculated against the variable cost（Tables 3 and 4）.Economic analysis of the experiment revealed that weed-free treatment recorded the highest net field benefits（Table 5）.Among herbicide treatments，the maximum（1 397.49 and 1 472.22 USD ha–1）net field benefits were achieved by the application of HC2under stubble retention in both years，respectively.This treatment recorded an increment of 250–275%in net field benefits as compared to respective weed-check（Table 5）.Nonetheless，application of HC1 in stubble incorporation stood the second best regarding net field benefit in both years（Table 5）.Weed-check treatment recorded the minimum net field benefits.

图表编号XD0047436000    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.04.20
作者Muhammad Zia-Ul-Haq、Abdul Khaliq、Qiang Sheng、Amar Matloob、Saddam Hussain、Saba Fatima、Zeshan Aslam
绘制单位Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture,Faisalabad、Weed Research Laboratory, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University、Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture,Faisalabad、Weed Research Laboratory, College of Life Science
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 2 Univariate analysis of the hospitalization costs for elderly inpatients due to falls (RMB)》2021.02.26
  2. 《Table 2 Univariate analysis of the hospitalization costs for elderly inpatients due to falls (RMB)》2021.02.26
  3. 《Table 1 Experiment scheme for the interaction treatment》2018.07.01
  4. 《Tab.1 Comparison of installation costs and total annual values for each configuration scheme》2019.11.05
  5. 《Table 1.Industrial analysis results for the reductant used in the experiments》2019.02.01
  6. 《TABLE IVTIME COST OF EACH TESTED MODEL TO ACHIEVE THE LOWESTPREDICTION ERROR IN THE EXPERIMENTS (IN SECONDS)》2019.01.01
  7. 《Table 2.Total number of patients administrated of IVIG and the incidence of adverse reactions for 3 consecutive years.》2019.01.01
  8. 《Table 2.comparison of the cost and product values for two processes[57].》2019.01.01
  9. 《Table 7 The number of facies models per TI for total 200models in Example A》2019.02.01
  10. 《Table 1 The control experiments for PAF-1-NHPro catalyzed Aldol reactiona》2019.02.01
  11. 《Table 1 The chemical properties and Cd content of the soil for experiment》2018.08.01
  12. 《表3 鳕鱼皮胶原蛋白肽即食凝胶配方正交试验因素水平Table 3 The orthogonal experiment factors and levels of for-mula of cod skin collagen peptidere》2018.02.01
  13. 《Table 2Initial conditions of the experiments for olivine-CO2-water interaction.》2018.11.01
  14. 《Table 2 Emissions in the 100%abatement scenarios for the NEM and Java-Bali power systems, and costs of generation capaci》2018.10.01
  15. 《Table 2 Optimal tilted angle for fixed grid-connected PV array in Beijing over the decades》2018.10.01
  16. 《表3 线型枢纽网络枢纽选址及总成本Tab.3 The hub location and total costs of linear hub network》2018.03.01
  17. 《表2 实验2的3种算法的航迹代价比较Table 2 Route costs of the three algorithms in Experiment 2》2018.07.01
  18. 《表2 爆源球形度实验Table 2 Sophericity experiments for the detonation device》2018.11.25
  19. 《表2 脱轻塔正交试验结果Table 2 Results of orthogonal experiments for the first column》2018.05.20
  20. 《表4 试验各处理施肥总量Table 4 Total amount of fertilizer applied in the experiment》2018.04.30

随机翻阅

《表1 公寓单塔模型周期计算结果》 《表2 常见骨科机器人切割技术》 《表1 2组疗效比较（例，%）》 《表1 混合标准气体组分：天然气水合物试采产出气组分在线检测研究》 《表1 两组患者手术前、后的CIPE-5、IIEF-5及IPSS评分比较（n=60,分）》 《表4 测定方法检出限及定量限》 《表三阅读理解测试题得分：基于“iWrite续写模块”的大学英语教学与实践研究——以天水师范学院为例》 《表1 各组小鼠旷场中运动的行为学指标 ()》 《表1 斜拉索无应力索长L0及拔出量Lb》 《表8 制造业不同生命周期创业导向与企业成长关系的回归结果》