《Table 2 Comparison of space-target extraction algorithms》

《Table 2 Comparison of space-target extraction algorithms》   提示:宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名:随高清版一同展现
《检测前跟踪框架下利用蒙特卡洛算法的空间碎片跟踪策略研究(英文)》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户?点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户?点击这里登录

Otherwise,in datasets A and C,as shown in Figs.2(a)-(c),both normal and critical dynamics of the atmospheric effect causing NN-αconsequently insert in It(x,y).Fig.3(a)-(c)depict the comparison of the extraction algorithms indicated by the output SCR.From the Fig.3(a)-(c)it is clearly proved that the proposed RGA-NN approach outperforms the median technique under the three categories of background interference,especially,the condition of a dynamic background.As the results,the average output SCR of the median and RGA-NN approaches are 5.245 and 6.324 for dataset A,9.991 and 11.130 for dataset B,and dataset C at 7.105 and 7.863,respectively.For the extraction performance,factors consist of improved-SCR(i SCR),which represents the enhancement of the extraction procedure with SCRibefore and after processing with output SCR and the background suppression factor(BSF),as illustrated in Table 2.