《Table 5 Comparison of substrate selectivity between the proposed method and DNS method (n=3)》

《Table 5 Comparison of substrate selectivity between the proposed method and DNS method (n=3)》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《一种基于血糖仪的简便且微量的β-葡萄糖苷酶活性检测方法（英文）》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

The DNS assay is most popular for the detection ofβ-glucosidase activity.However，it requires the reaction of sugar and DNS.To simplify the experimental procedure and simultaneously reduce the consumption of both sample and reagent，differentreaction mixture volumes（40 to 2000μL）were studied.As shown in Table 6，the activity of crude almondβ-glucosidase samples was similar at different volumes.The smallest volume of 40μL was sufficient to detectβ-glucosidase activity using the proposed assay.In addition，the proposed method was free from requiring a chromogenic reaction.Thus，the proposed method was shown to be a simpler，lower-cost，and more efficient method than the DNS assay.

图表编号XD0061889100    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.03.03
作者Min-yi JIN、Tong ZHANG、Yi-shun YANG、Yue DING、Jun-song LI、Gao-ren ZHONG
绘制单位Experiment Center for Teaching and Learning, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine、Experiment Center for Teaching and Learning, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine、Experiment Center for Teaching and Learning, Shanghai Univers
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups》2018.08.20
  2. 《Table 1 Comparison of baseline information between the two groups》2018.08.20
  3. 《Table 1 Comparison of baseline information between the two groups》2018.08.20
  4. 《表5 极限承载力试验值与规范值比较Table 5 Comparison between the test value of ultimate bearing capacity and the estimated value accordin》2018.08.25
  5. 《Table 3 Alleles discrepancy of the selected 30 variants between cases and controls in the second stage of time of flight》2020.08.01
  6. 《Table 2:Comparison of the Connotations and Characteristics between Industrialization and Ecologicalization》
  7. 《Table 1“Participants,Intervention,Comparison,Outcome and Study Design”approach for the selection of clinical studies fol》2019.12.20
  8. 《Table 1.Comparison of Clinical Data between the Two Groups》2019.05.01
  9. 《Table 2 Comparison of the survival quality between 2 groups after operation》2019.04.20
  10. 《Table 2 Comparison of mean dose of salivary glands between the two plans》2019.02.20
  11. 《Table 3 Comparison of D50 of parotid between the two plans》2019.02.20
  12. 《Table 3 Comparison of the 3-years curative effect between two groups》2019.02.20
  13. 《Table 2.Comparison of the vital signs and pain scores between the two groups》2019.01.01
  14. 《Table 1 The comparison of baseline characteristics between twogroups》2019.01.18
  15. 《表5-55℃时LTCC基板表面试验与仿真位移对比Tab.5 Comparison of LTCC substrate surface displacements from the test and simulation at-55℃》2019.01.05
  16. 《表5 2组各时间点植物状态评分比较 (±s, 分) Table 5 Comparison of plant status scores between the two groups of plants in different time p》2018.08.25
  17. 《表5 Bell等 (2003) 校正方法和本文新方法对橄榄石含水量的对比Table 5 Comparison between the calibration of Bell et al., 2003 and the new method d》2018.02.20
  18. 《Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups (n=80)》2018.06.10
  19. 《表5 两组间营养不良比较-SGA营养评估[n (%) ]Table 5 comparison of malnutrition between the two groups-SGA nutrition assessment[n (%) ]》2018.07.10
  20. 《表7 基质理化性质与黑木耳产量和生物转化率的相关关系Table 7 Correlations (R) between chemical properties of the substrates and yield and BE》2018.10.15

随机翻阅

《表2 成本计算结果：计及综合需求侧响应的电-气综合能源系统协调优化运行》 《表2 采用PCA和RRR方法提取的中小学生膳食模式因子载荷》 《表2 不同铝硫比无碱速凝剂的凝结时间》 《表2 老年冠心病合并高血压及糖尿病共病患者健康促进行为影响因素的赋值》 《表5 2019年豆粕样品霉菌毒素检测结果》 《表4 油炸处理工艺的正交试验因素水平表》 《表5 实验室指标与肠道菌群失调程度的关系》 《表2 金融集聚指标权重》 《表1 水泥的主要性能指标》 《表2 两组护理满意率比较》