《Table 1.Comparison of Clinical Data between the Two Groups》

《Table 1.Comparison of Clinical Data between the Two Groups》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Effect of Shexiang Tongxin Dropping Pills(麝香通心滴丸) on the Immediate Blood Flow of Patients with Coronary Slow Flow》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

The average CFTC values measured at the LAD LCX，and RCA of patients in the CSF group were greater than those of the subjects in the control group（P<0.01，Table 2）.

图表编号XD0049342700    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.05.01
作者WANG Sheng-huang、CHU Lin、XU Zhao、ZHOU Hong-lin、CHEN Jiang-fei、NING Huang-fu
绘制单位Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ningbo Hospital of Zhejiang University, Ningbo First Hospital、Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ningbo Hospital of Zhejiang University, Ningbo First Hospital、Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ningbo Hospita
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups》2018.08.20
  2. 《Table 1 Comparison of baseline information between the two groups》2018.08.20
  3. 《Table 1 Comparison of baseline information between the two groups》2018.08.20
  4. 《表1 2组患者临床资料比较Tab.1 Comparison of clinical data between the two treatment groups》2019.01.30
  5. 《表1 两组患者基本资料比较Tab.1 Comparison of basic clinical data between the two groups》2019.02.28
  6. 《表1 不同临床资料在两组间的差异Tab.1 Comparison of clinical data of the two groups of patients》2019.02.01
  7. 《表1 两组临床资料对比Tab 1 Comparison of clinical data between two groups》2019.01.08
  8. 《Table 1 Comparison of clinical and pathological characteristics between two groups》2019.04.20
  9. 《表1 两组基线资料比较Tab.1 Comparison of the baseline data between the two groups》2019.02.28
  10. 《表1 两组患者一般资料比较Tab.1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups》2019.03.05
  11. 《表1 两组患者临床资料比较 (n=20) Tab 1 Comparison of clinical data between two groups (n=20)》2019.01.15
  12. 《表1 2组患者临床资料Tab 1 The comparison of clinical data between the two groups》2019.02.01
  13. 《表1 两组患者一般资料比较Tab.1 Comparison of clinical data between the 2 groups》2018.08.19
  14. 《表1 2组患者种植体临床牙周指数比较Tab 1 Comparison of the clinical periodontal index of implants between two groups》2018.07.01
  15. 《表2 两组患者临床资料比较Table 2 Comparison of clinical data between two groups》2018.08.10
  16. 《Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups (n=80)》2018.06.10
  17. 《表1 两组患者的临床资料比较Tab.1 Comparison of clinical data between the two groups (Mean±SD)》2018.02.20
  18. 《表1 两组一般资料及SWI比较 (±s) Tab.1 Comparison of general clinical data and SWI between the two groups (±s)》2018.11.01
  19. 《表1 两组患者围手术期各项数据比较Tab 1 Comparison of the perioperative data between the two groups》2018.04.20
  20. 《表1 两组间一般临床资料比较Tab 1 Comparison of the clinical features between two groups》2018.06.20

随机翻阅

《表3 改性瓜胶溶液静态交联过程弛豫时间动力学模型参数》 《表2 结果对比分析：基于TF-IDF特征词提取的不平衡文本分类》 《表3 探索性因子分析结果》 《表2 1 交通条件与非农收入》 《表4 北京大学本科生大学英语课程选课情况示意》 《表2 气弹模型模态参数识别结果》 《表4 不同气淬压力下试样的力学性能》 《表7 路面渗水系数：沥青路面预防性养护雾封层措施应用效果对比研究》 《表3 一般资料对特需病房护士心理弹性的影响(n=81,分,±s)》 《表1 不同性别地中海疾病类别筛查结果n (%)》