《Table 3 The quality and structure of the neural model produced》

《Table 3 The quality and structure of the neural model produced》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Simple model based on artificial neural network for early prediction and simulation winter rapeseed yield》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

In total，data from 291 fields were used to build and verify the neural model（Table 1）.This information formed the basis for the database creation in order to build the predictive model，which was divided into two sets，A and B.Set A（246 fields）accounted for information from the 2008–2016period，which was used to construct the following models.Set B contained data from 2017（45 fields）and was used only for the validation of model.

图表编号XD0047424700    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.01.20
作者Gniewko Niedbaa
绘制单位Institute of Biosystems Engineering,Faculty of Agronomy and Bioengineering,Poznań University of Life Sciences
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 3 Standards of quality grade in produces of agriculture, animal husbandry and fishery》2018.08.01
  2. 《Table 2 Structure of Chapters and Contents of the Atlas》2019.12.01
  3. 《Table 3 Structure of“Mineral water testing and analysis.xlsx”in the Dataset》2019.12.01
  4. 《Table 3 Quality assessment and risk of bias of the included non-randomised studies》2020.03.26
  5. 《Table 3 Quality assessment and risk of bias of the included non-randomised studies》2020.03.26
  6. 《Table 2 The calibration parameters in hydrodynamic and water quality model》2019.03.01
  7. 《Table 3.Structures and Predicted Activities of the Designed Molecules》2019.01.01
  8. 《Table 3.Summary of the statistics for the modeled, AERONET and CARSNET observed AOD comparisons.》2019.01.10
  9. 《表4 神经网络的参数和结果Table 4 Parameters and results of the neural network》2018.04.30
  10. 《表3 风障对品质和产量的影响Table 3 The effect of windbreak on quality and yield》2018.04.10
  11. 《表3 水质迁移转化模型参数率定结果Table 3 The result of parameter determination of water quality transfer model》2018.05.01
  12. 《Table 4 Comparison of economic structures of the baseline and Scenario 1》2018.10.01
  13. 《Table 3 Input data required by the selected hydrological and water quality models[22, 23, 37, 38, 53–55, 63–67]》2018.12.01
  14. 《表2 灰色关联分析及神经网络预测结果Table 2 Predicted results of the grey correlation analysis and neural network》2018.04.01
  15. 《表2 卷积神经网络结构表Table 2 The convolutional neural network structure》2018.06.01
  16. 《表2 LS-SVM和小波神经网络对实测噪声建模的比较Tab.2 Comparison of noise modeling by the LS-SVM and wavelet neural networks》2018.08.25
  17. 《表3 BP神经网络与经验公式预测结果对比Table 3 The comparison of the results about the BP neural network and Empirical formula prediction》2018.06.01
  18. 《表2 BP神经网络的预测样本及预测结果Table 2 The test samples and the prediction results of BP neural network》2018.06.01
  19. 《Table 3 HOMO, LUMO energies and FMO energy gap of the structures》2018.10.01
  20. 《表3 农畜水产品质量分级标准Table 3 Standard of quality grade in produces of agriculture, animal husbandry and fishery》2018.09.30

随机翻阅

《表6 实例比较分析：基于公共价值的农地整治绩效评价——以湖北省、湖南省和河北省的调查为例》 《表3 月桂酰肌氨酸钠不同添加量及温度变化对沐浴露黏度的影响》 《表7 审计意见改善的二元Logit回归结果》 《表2 删除v6→v2=8边后的回路》 《表2 茄子单株产量对比：一种无药害农产品的生产方法及装置的应用效果》 《表1 2008-2017年沧州市猩红热发病情况》 《表1 先天性小耳畸形及其相关基因[11-22, 25-26, 38]》 《表1 本研究变量测量题项及参考来源》 《表2 多分类有序Logistic模型拟合结果》 《表1 对比组间引产成功率[n(%)]》