《Table 4 Comparison of the traits of‘Lvyou No.1’with the control‘Zhongnong 26’》

《Table 4 Comparison of the traits of‘Lvyou No.1’with the control‘Zhongnong 26’》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Breeding of A New Cucumber Variety ‘Lvyou No.1'》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

In 2015，a comparative test was carried out to the commodity traits of‘Lvyou No.1’and the control‘Zhongnong 26’at the test base of Shandong Huasheng Agriculture Co.Ltd.The results showed that‘Lvyou No.1’was better than the control‘Zhongnong 26’in the aspects of thorns，fruit appearance and luster（Table 4）.

图表编号XD00183027000    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.06.01
作者Yuying GUO、Xingsheng LI、Xiaowei YUAN
绘制单位Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cucurbitaceae Vegetable Biological Breeding、Shandong Huasheng Agriculture Co.Ltd.、Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cucurbitaceae Vegetable Biological Breeding、Shandong Huasheng Agriculture Co.Ltd.、Shandong Provin
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Comparison of the average growth of eight diameter groups with that of basal trunk of the same age》2018.08.01
  2. 《Table 3 Comparison of the resistance of‘Lvyou No.1’with the control‘Zhongnong 26’》2018.06.01
  3. 《Table 2 Comparison results of field pupularization of‘Lvyou No.1’》2018.06.01
  4. 《Table 3 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the subgroups of patients with steroid-free clinical response ver》2019.08.21
  5. 《Table 9 Statistical comparison of the proposed method with the pNPG assay (n=3)》2019.03.03
  6. 《Table 8 Statistical comparison of the proposed method with the DNS assay (n=3)》2019.03.03
  7. 《Table 1A comparison of the conventional drug discovery and development process with those of the CAR-based living drug.》2019.02.01
  8. 《Table 1 Comparison of the extraction efficiency of LAEG-40 with the conventional solvents under the optimized extraction》2019.05.10
  9. 《Table 2 Comparison of results with the original NCEP/NCAR temperature data》2017.03.25
  10. 《Table 4 Comparison of melatonin levels in glaucoma patients with psychiatric disorders and the control group》2018.08.18
  11. 《Table 2 The measurements of Epimanteoceras mae sp.nov.and the comparison with several Irdinmanhan and Bridgerian brontot》2018.01.01
  12. 《Table 2:Comparison with the method in[10]for the number of iterations》2018.12.15
  13. 《表4 本实验与传统ELISA方法对比Table 4 Comparison of the developed method with centrifugal microfluidic chip》2018.03.01
  14. 《表4 所建立方法与传统分散液-液微萃取和其它报道的方法进行比较Table 4 Comparison of the established method with traditional DLLME and other reported me》2018.05.01
  15. 《表4 国内外典型白云岩喀斯特的对比特征Table 4 Comparison with other typical dolomite karsts of the world》2018.05.01
  16. 《Table 3–Average values of seven traits of the selected lines F2, F2:3compared with parents and check variegties.》2018.04.01
  17. 《表7 同铺层厚度下的固有频率比较Table 7 The natural frequency comparison with the thickness of the layer》2018.05.28
  18. 《表7 1~4号滑坡危险性状态评价结果对比表Table 7 Comparison of risk assessment results of the No.1-4 landslide》2018.04.01
  19. 《表2 不同品种子实体农艺性状比较Table 2 Comparison on the agronomic traits of fruit of the different strains》2018.07.15
  20. 《表3 萝卜种质品质性状检测结果分析Table 3 Basic statistical analysis of the traits related with the quality of the radish germplasm》2018.06.15

随机翻阅

《表1 南芬露天铁矿绿泥角闪岩强度参数》 《表3 动态相关系数的驱动因素回归结果》 《表1 我国海水淡化开发利用潜力评价指标及权重》 《表3 不同种植密度条件下玉米籽粒产量及其构成因素》 《表3 城乡教师作业类型：居家学习情境下城乡网课学习差异的现状调查》 《表1 各潮流分布指标对比》 《表5 TMD最优参数：基于TMD-HMD的海上浮式风力机主被动综合振动控制》 《表1 我国高镁盐湖卤水提锂工业应用方法》 《表3 病区把手及各类人员手细菌、致病菌检出率 (%)》 《表3 6种真菌毒素的线性关系和检测限》