《Table 2 Comparison of results with the original NCEP/NCAR temperature data》

《Table 2 Comparison of results with the original NCEP/NCAR temperature data》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《中国1km栅格月平均气温数据集》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

The regression tree model was applied to the corresponding NDVI and DEM data to obtain the monthly temperature data with 1 km spatial resolution.The data were aggregated to the NCEP/NCAR scale（50 km）using a simple averaging method.The averaged data were then subtracted from the NCEP/NCAR data.The residuals were interpolated using the thin spline technique to the 1 km scale，by adding this high-resolution residual to the predicted temperature and precipitation at 1 km resolution，the final downscaled monthly average temperature and monthly total precipitation of China at 1 km resolution being obtained.Figure 3 shows the downscaled temperature for May 2005.

图表编号XD0027612100    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2017.03.25
作者荆文龙、杨雅萍、乐夏芳
绘制单位中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所、中国科学院大学、中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所、中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《表2 与其他文献LDO电路仿真结果比较Tab.2 Simulation results comparison of the proposed LDO with previous works》2018.12.03
  2. 《Table 2 Comparison of AIM charges, obtained from different types of EEM methods, with the results calculated at the B3LY》2019.01.15
  3. 《Table 2–Concentrations of PAHs with different rings and their removal efficiency in the original soil, light, and heavy》2019.04.15
  4. 《表2 预测数据与NCEP/NCAR原始温度数据的比较》2017.03.25
  5. 《表2 测试样本中原始[Si]序列与预测[Si]序列统计学比较结果Table 2 Statistical comparison of the original[Si]sequence with the predicted[Si]sequenc》2018.08.30
  6. 《表5 优化结果与原始结果比较Table 5Comparison of optimization results and original results》2018.05.25
  7. 《表4 模拟值与监测值对比Table 4 Comparison of simulated results with observed results》2018.10.15
  8. 《表4 3组预测结果与原始测值残差对比Table 4 Comparison of 3sets of prediction results and original measured value residual mm》2018.10.25
  9. 《Table 5Comparison of RTK results obtained with mass-market receiver with respect the geodetic one.All statistical parame》2018.11.01
  10. 《表3 含有谐波时结果对比Table 3 Comparison of results with harmonic time》2018.06.30
  11. 《Table 2:Comparison with the method in[10]for the number of iterations》2018.12.15
  12. 《表2 不同策略的故障恢复结果比较Table 2 Comparison of service restoration results with different strategies》2018.01.10
  13. 《表2 13种数据集月降水过程与月降水观测过程对比结果Tab.2 Comparison of results of 13 precipitation datasets with the observed precipitation datas》2018.11.28
  14. 《Table 4 Performance comparison of forecasting results with30min ahead》2018.12.01
  15. 《Table 3 Performance comparison of forecasting results with15min ahead》2018.12.01
  16. 《Table 2 Performance comparison of forecasting results with30min ahead》2018.12.01
  17. 《Table 1 Performance comparison of forecasting results with15min ahead》2018.12.01
  18. 《Table 2 Summary of the test results with different widths》2018.11.01
  19. 《表4 原始算法和改进Memoryless算法的对比分析结果Tab.4 Comparison of the Simplified Results with Original Algorithm and Improved Algorithm》2018.11.20
  20. 《表2 不同操纵导数时评定结果对比Table 2 Comparison of assessment results with different control derivatives》2018.02.01

随机翻阅

《表2 系统田间动态试验数据》 《表4 不同施肥对小麦亩产量与亩秸秆干重之比的影响》 《表6 砌体的抗拉应力-应变关系》 《表2 高新技术产业发展指标权重》 《表3 幼苗接种成活率比较》 《表4 荷载定义：不同轴压比钢管混凝土边缘约束叠合剪力墙的抗震性能》 《表2 两组患者其他治疗情况情况对比》 《表2 速率回归方程：紫外线照射对炼乳空桶杀菌效果及其动力学研究》 《表2 规划结果对比：考虑功率交换的微电网群协同规划研究》 《表9 模型开孔尺寸：造桥机主梁腹板的开孔方法》