《Tab.3 Comparison of the results obtained by different methods (ε=0)》

《Tab.3 Comparison of the results obtained by different methods (ε=0)》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《一种考虑重汇聚结构的电路信号概率加权平均计算方法（英文）》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

First，by comparing w ith the IWAA[6]，the effectiveness of the algorithms proposed in this paper is tested w hen the gate error rateε=0，and the results are show n in Tab.3.Then，experiments are performed on Algorithms 3 and 4 for different values ofε.The comparison results of the IWAA[7]are show n in Tab.4.Furthermore，considering that the IWAA[6]can also be used to calculate the SP for the circuit w ith a gate error rate by using Eq.（1），we conduct some experiments based on Algorithm3，Algorithm 4 and the IWAA[6]，respectively.Simulation results are show n in Figs.9 and 10.

图表编号XD0015629400    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.06.01
作者肖杰、马伟峰、李伟、施展辉
绘制单位浙江工业大学计算机科学与技术学院、浙江工业大学计算机科学与技术学院、浙江工业大学计算机科学与技术学院、浙江工业大学计算机科学与技术学院
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 2 Comparison of the segmentation results for the four different methods》2019.03.25
  2. 《Table 1 Comparison of the segmentation results for the four different methods》2019.03.25
  3. 《Tab.3 Crystal distribution of tobacco cellulose obtained by four extraction methods》2019.06.01
  4. 《Table 2 Comparison of AIM charges, obtained from different types of EEM methods, with the results calculated at the B3LY》2019.01.15
  5. 《表1 不同计算方法所得土压力值对比Tab.1 Comparison of soil pressure values obtained by different calculation methods》2019.05.01
  6. 《表2 不同算法调度结果比较Tab.2 Comparison of results obtained by different algorithms》2019.02.25
  7. 《Table 3 Comparison of the results by different methods for the three datasets》2019.02.01
  8. 《表3 不同染色方法染色织物的性能对比Tab.3 Comparison of properties of dyed fabrics by different dyeing methods》2019.01.15
  9. 《表3 两种方法求得的活化能对比Table 3Comparison of activation energy obtained by the two methods》2018.09.25
  10. 《表3 不同设计方法实现的串行输出接口性能比较Tab.3 Performance comparison of multiplexer designed by different methods》2018.10.01
  11. 《Table S4.Nucleotide composition of mitogenome obtained by the results of Sanger and HTS methods.》2018.10.01
  12. 《Table S4.Nucleotide composition of mitogenome obtained by the results of Sanger and HTS methods.》2018.10.01
  13. 《Table S4.Nucleotide composition of mitogenome obtained by the results of Sanger and HTS methods.》2018.10.01
  14. 《表3 利用石英Al心和Ti-Li心ESR信号获得的样品年代结果Tab.3 The results of age values of samples obtained by using the quartz Al center and Ti-》2018.12.01
  15. 《表2 约束稳定方法与指标1、2、3DAEs结果比较 (h=0.0001) Table 2 Comparison of the results obtained by constraints stabilization method and》2018.04.20
  16. 《表4 不同插值方法的结果比较Tab.4 Comparison of the results calculated by different interpolation methods》2018.02.28
  17. 《表1 两种方法计算结果的对比Tab.1 Comparison of the calculation results by two methods》2018.11.30
  18. 《表5 不同评价方法评价结果比较Tab.5 Comparison of assessment result derived by different methods》2018.08.01
  19. 《表4 不同方法目标提取精度Tab.4 The accuracies of roadside objects extracted results (%) by different methods》2018.02.01
  20. 《Table 1 Comparison of roll center height results obtained by the graphic method and simulation》2018.10.15

随机翻阅

《表1 数据集统计：基于多维社交关系嵌入的深层图神经网络推荐方法》 《表2 不确定度分量及比重Tab.2 Uncertainty components and specific gravity》 《表7 现场测量统计：装配式结构预制叠合梁生产质量控制的研究——提高预制叠合梁产品优良品率》 《表3 地温情况统计表：贵州省兴仁县大山—新庄地区地热资源找矿浅析》 《表1 影响甲状腺切除术后甲状旁腺功能减退的单因素分析》 《表1 患者一般资料：竖脊肌平面阻滞与前锯肌平面阻滞对胸腔镜手术术后急性疼痛的影响》 《表1 新旧标准程序文件对比》 《表1 两组治疗有效率对比[n (%) ]》 《附表金华市打赢蓝天保卫战主要目标清单》 《表4 邻避项目社会稳定风险成因分析典型案例事实表》