《Table 1.Clinical effects comparison (%)》

《Table 1.Clinical effects comparison (%)》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《"Effects of Maixuekang Capsules Combined with Edaravone on Serum MMP-9, S-100β Protein Levels and Neurological Functions in Patients with Hemorrhagic Cerebral Infarction"》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

The total effective rate in treatment group（92.11%）was significantly higher than that（71.05%）of control group（P<0.05）.See Table 1.

图表编号XD0043294600    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.01.01
作者张建强、焦永平
绘制单位Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology、Department of Neurology, Linying People's Hospital
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Comparison of fitting effects of random forest regression model before and after parameter tuning》2021.01.20
  2. 《Table 1 Comparison of selenium-enriching effect of different vegetables》2018.10.01
  3. 《Table 2 Comparison of planting effects of different planting densities of greenhouse Toona sinensis》2018.03.01
  4. 《Table 5 Comparison of algorithm effectiveness表5算法有效性的比较》2019.03.01
  5. 《Table 5 Comparison of effectiveness outcomes between esophagus group and cardia group n (%)》2019.01.14
  6. 《Table 1.Comparison of disease control effects between 2 groups[n (%) ]》2019.04.20
  7. 《Table 3 Comparison of the 3-years curative effect between two groups》2019.02.20
  8. 《表1 图像融合效果各指标对比分析数据表Tab.1 Image fusion effect comparison index data table》2019.05.01
  9. 《Table 2 Comparison of denoising effects》2019.01.25
  10. 《表2 2组有效率比较[n (%) ]Table 2 Comparison of total effective rate of 2 groups[n (%) ]》2018.07.15
  11. 《表2 两组治疗效果对比Table 2 Comparison of therapeutic effects between two groups》2018.09.25
  12. 《表2 两组患者临床疗效比较Table 2 Comparison of the clinical curative effect between two groups》2018.01.10
  13. 《表4 两组患者治疗效果比较Table 4 Comparison of therapeutic effect between two groups of patients》2018.02.28
  14. 《表3 教学效果的比较Table 3 Comparison of teaching effects》2018.03.18
  15. 《表2 限流效果比较Table 2 Comparison of current limiting effects》2018.01.10
  16. 《表2 两组患者的诊断效果对比 (%) Table 2 Comparison of diagnostic effects between the two groups (%)》2018.08.01
  17. 《表2 临床疗效比较[例 (%) ]Table 2 Comparison of clinical curative effect[cases (%) ]》2018.06.30
  18. 《Table 1 Comparison of the effective rate of angina pectoris (12 weeks)》2018.05.01
  19. 《Table 5Comparison of the effect of various abrasive blasting conditions on the surface finish.》2019.08.01
  20. 《表2 不同治疗方案疗效比较Table 2 Comparison of curative effect between different therapeutic regimens》2018.02.20

随机翻阅

《表2 医护人员焦虑影响因素的logistics回归分析》 《表1 2组治疗前后SF-36生活质量评分比较（±s）分》 《表1 实验组与对照组在星级服务形象、外在形象、专业技术形象情况》 《表7 感官评定标准得分：非油炸香菇脆片的加工工艺研究》 《表1 成品带钢技术参数》 《表1 两组一般资料比较》 《表2 3组患者对肿瘤化疗后肝功能影响的疗效》 《表1 研究对象的基本情况》 《表1《全蜀边域考》不同影印本的册次对比》 《表1 钢铁供给侧改革主要政策》