《Table 2.Comparison of experimental data and numerical results.》

《Table 2.Comparison of experimental data and numerical results.》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Plasma discharge characteristics of segmented diverter strips subject to lightning strike》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

（3） Some laws and phenomena are verified by test resultsconcerning the segmented diverter strip obtained by numerical simulation.The relative errors between simulation and experimental results do not exceed14.28%.The segmented diverter strip has no ablation marks under high voltage and the strip can be reused under high voltage.

图表编号XD0030230500    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.02.01
作者陈汉、王富生、熊秀、何征、岳珠峰
绘制单位School of Mechanics Civil Engineering and Architecture Northwestern Polytechnical University、School of Mechanics Civil Engineering and Architecture Northwestern Polytechnical University、Airborne Electromagnetic Technology Co. Ltd、Airborne Electromagnetic
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《表2 试验结果与数值模拟结果Table 2 Experimental and numerical results》2018.04.01
  2. 《表2 试验结果与实际情况对比Tab.2 Comparison of experimental results and actual conditions》2019.02.20
  3. 《Table 2 Comparison of experimental and numerical results for pressure drop》2019.01.03
  4. 《表3实验结果信噪比和数据处理序列Tab.3 SNR of experimental results and data processing sequence》2019.01.10
  5. 《表2 不同倾角的实验数据对比Tab.2 Comparison table of experimental data with different dip angles》2019.01.25
  6. 《Table 2 The numerical results and the theoretical values of the shear waves and longitudinal waves velocities》2019.01.25
  7. 《表1 0 桥梁结构颤振临界风速计算结果与试验结果比较Tab.10 Comparison of numerical and experimental results of flutter critical wind speeds of the》2019.03.25
  8. 《Table 2 Comparison of results with the original NCEP/NCAR temperature data》2017.03.25
  9. 《表2 不同节理角度下砂岩峰值应力和峰值应变的试验与数值结果Tab.2 Experimental and numerical results of peak stress and peak strain of sandstone under》2018.07.20
  10. 《表2 单周期内模型拟合得到的预测值和实验数据之间的对比Table 2 Comparison of predicted and experimental data for nitrogen removal at single circle》2018.10.15
  11. 《Table 2:Comparison of the absolutes for the numerical results and absolute errors at point ti=0.0:0.2:1.0 in Example 2》2018.02.15
  12. 《表2 采样值、模拟值及其相对误差Table 2 Comparison of sampled data and simulated results》2018.07.01
  13. 《表4 有限元法结果与实验数据对比Table 4 Comparison of FEM result and experimental data》2018.01.01
  14. 《表3 2017.03.09-03.31实验数据与ECMWF数据的模型结果Tab.3 Result of experimental data and ECMWF data modelling from Mar.9th to 31st, 201》2018.04.01
  15. 《表2 撞击极限速度计算值与实验结果比较Table 2 Comparison between the calculated results and the experimental results of the ballistics limi》2018.04.25
  16. 《表2 回弹模拟及实验结果对比Table 2 Comparison of simulation and experimental results》2018.04.01
  17. 《Table 2 Comparison between experimental results and graphic method》2018.10.15
  18. 《表2 CHNO类单质炸药爆速的实验与计算对比Table 2 Comparison between experimental and calculated data of pure CHNO explosives detonation vel》2018.01.25
  19. 《表4 底板的中心挠度与板厚比δm/Hm的试验值和有限元计算值Tab.4 Experimental and numerical results of the measured deflection-to-thickness ratio (δm》2018.08.01
  20. 《表2 峰值应力试验值与计算值的比较结果Table 2 Comparison results of peak stress between experimental and calculated values》2018.07.25

随机翻阅

《表1 文化企业绩效综合评价指标体系一览表》 《表4 福建地区地震动局部地形影响因子表》 《表6 洗涤参数对下摆子外观性能影响筛选结果》 《表2 管理方法方可行性评分（分，±s)》 《表9 L9(34)正交分析表》 《表1 平台子系统技术路线表》 《表1 安装现场配置的应急物资及设备》 《表2 本文统计的职业中毒案例》 《表6 SB/T 10794—2012中M包温度分类[3]》 《表2 主区外边界R取值：ICAO和FAA PBN离场飞行程序设计规范差异研究》