《Table 1 Modified UCSF down-staging criteria》

《Table 1 Modified UCSF down-staging criteria》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Hepatocellular carcinoma-time to take the ticket》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

The data from the global investigation of therapeutic decision in HCC and of treatment with sorafenib（referred to as“GIDEON”）[10]have shown that the combination of TACE and sorafenib has a beneficial effect on overall survival in patients with advanced disease.The START trial[11]also supports the abovementioned finding.The SPACE trial[12]tried this combination on the Barcelona stage B HCC and did not find any difference compared to using TACE alone.Even though few of the latest studies[13]have shown benefit，further investigation is required，and feasibility of this combination for down-staging needs to be evaluated.

图表编号XD0077757700    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.06.27
作者Anju Mullath、Murali Krishna
绘制单位Department of Gastroenterology, Lakeshore Hospital and Research Centre、Department of Surgery, Military Hospital
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria.》2020.08.01
  2. 《Table 1 Donor screening criteria[15,90]》2020.02.28
  3. 《续表2 感官评分标准Continue table 2 Criteria for sensory evaluation》2019.08.20
  4. 《Table 3 Criteria including tumor biomarkers》2019.06.27
  5. 《Table 2 Extended criteria currently in use》2019.06.27
  6. 《Table 3 The final weight of each vulnerability criteria》2019.03.01
  7. 《Table 2 A list of criteria for CCBE》2019.01.03
  8. 《Table 1.Criteria for sero-panel sample classification》2019.02.20
  9. 《Table 1 Search strategy and selection criteria》2019.04.01
  10. 《表2 故障影响等级评级标准Table 2 Failure rating rating criteria》2019.03.01
  11. 《表4 本组术后改良MacNab分级标准评价Tab.4 Postoperative outcomes according to the modified MacNab criteria》2019.02.19
  12. 《Table 1 Ames test of protein-modified E.faecalis》2019.02.01
  13. 《Table 1 Classifying criteria of the basic soil layers》2017.03.01
  14. 《表2 操作空间评价准则Table 2 Operational space evaluation criteria》2018.02.15
  15. 《表3 工作姿态评价准则Table 3 Working gesture evaluation criteria》2018.02.15
  16. 《Table 1Inclusion and exclusion criteria of patient selection.》2018.12.15
  17. 《Table 1 Comparison of performance with different modified electrodes》2018.04.10
  18. 《表4 预警准则 (阈值) Table 4 Pre-warning criteria (thresholds)》2018.06.01
  19. 《表2 准则层指标权重Table 2 Index weight of criteria layer》2018.06.25
  20. 《Table 1.Details of the 21 ESCSs according to the-3/5 criteria.》2018.09.16

随机翻阅

《表1 传感器具体位置：基于负压波信号消除的管道泄漏定位算法》 《表1 循环水降温时合成炉温度》 《表2 各组Hep2细胞迁移距离和数量比较》 《表3 典型舱段不同结构吸能对比》 《表4 粘合剂RC用量对钢丝编织液压胶管外层胶物理性能的影响》 《表1 两组患者临床疗效比较[n(%)]》 《表1 问卷设计与题项：面向网络零售的感知风险与购买意愿相关性》 《表2 能源产业及分行业全要素生产率》 《表2 不同户型农户的流转率及撂荒率》 《表4 教学平台：若干世界一流大学数据库课程实施情况调研》