《Table 2 Experimental results in three different scenarios performed with one input/one output model

《Table 2 Experimental results in three different scenarios performed with one input/one output model   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Viscous fingering and its effect on areal sweep efficiency during waterflooding: an experimental study》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

A summary of experimental results in this section is shown in Table 2.It can be seen that the breakthrough time is reduced by increasing the injection rate.At a flow rate of1.0 mL/min，the value of areal sweep efficiency was very low at the breakthrough in spite of the greater amount of water injected.However，there was an optimum injection rate，which was 0.5 mL/min in this study at which the maximum oil displacement occurs.

图表编号XD0042157200    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.02.01
作者Zahra Kargozarfard、Masoud Riazi、Shahab Ayatollahi
绘制单位Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Research Centre, IOR-EOR Research Institute, Shiraz University、Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Research Centre, IOR-EOR Research Institute, Shiraz University、Department of Petroleum Engineering, School of Chemical and Petroleum Eng
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 3Differences in agricultural producer service industry in the three major regions during 2003-2016 based on Theil》2018.06.01
  2. 《Table 4 Structural changes in optimal construction land in Beijing under three scenarios》2020.03.25
  3. 《Table 2 Contents of heavy metal elements in chilled pork samples from three different sources》2019.01.03
  4. 《Tab.2 Comparative analysis of color evaluation results in different time points between three groups表2各组样本在不同时期颜色评估结果对比分》2019.03.15
  5. 《Table 4 Difference between experimental and calculation results to A throttle tube》2019.01.01
  6. 《Table 3 Experimental results in two scenarios performed with two input/one output models》2019.02.01
  7. 《Table 4 Experimental results in different scenarios performed with fractured models》2019.02.01
  8. 《Table 8 Simulated and experimental NO and CO emissions in the different modes.》
  9. 《Table 2 Experimental result comparison among different models表2不同模型实验对比结果》2019.01.01
  10. 《Table 3 Comparison of the results by different methods for the three datasets》2019.02.01
  11. 《表4 不同作业规模下3种算法的复合作业模拟结果Tab.4 Experimental results of three algorithms on differ-ent scale problems by compound operation》2019.04.10
  12. 《Table 3.The best fitted continuum parameters in three different phases.》2018.06.30
  13. 《表2 不同基质的加标回收率试验结果Table 2 Experimental results of recovery in different substrate》2018.06.25
  14. 《表2 不同放大倍数实验结果数据表Table 2 The experimental results with different magnifications》2018.01.01
  15. 《表2 不同实验周期试样的平均腐蚀速率Table 2 Average corrosion rate of samples in different experimental periods》2018.06.20
  16. 《表3 子流域综合CN值Table 3 Integrated CN values of sub-basins in different land use scenarios》2018.06.01
  17. 《表2 3种算法在不同规模问题下的实验结果Tab.2 Experimental results of three algorithms at different scales》2018.04.10
  18. 《表2 18组有限元模型仿真结果Table 2 Differences of simulation results between18 experimental models》2018.04.01
  19. 《表2 不同预测模型实验结果对比 (B飞机) Table 2 Experimental results for different prediction models (Aircraft B)》2018.04.01
  20. 《Table 2Experimental results for the recirculation ratio and correlation factors of different APT production processes.》2019.08.01

随机翻阅

《表2 1941年以后边区煤窑数与采煤量增长情况表》 《表1 实验器材型号：自循环水平往返冲击工作原理的研究》 《表1 不同水活度条件下冠突散囊菌发酵后的主要香气成分及相对含量》 《表1 高校档案资源数据化典型任务需求》 《表1 观察组护理质量评价结果统计》 《表5 供试蕨麻材料信息》 《表1 对两种方法的误诊漏诊率予以比较[n (%) ]》 《表2 水稻不同移栽方式的主要农艺性状》 《表1 两组一般资料比较 (例)》 《表8 女性犯罪人与侵害对象的熟悉程度》