《Table 2 Comparison between groups A and B regarding patientsatisfaction》

《Table 2 Comparison between groups A and B regarding patientsatisfaction》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Management of tear trough deformity with and without tear trough-orbicularis retaining ligament complex release in transconjunctival blepharoplasty: a comparative study》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
n （%）

Comparison Between the Two Groups Regarding the Four Measurements Pre-and Postoperatively（Quantitative Analysis of Tear Trough）When comparing postoperative C-TT，Lid-TT，Thick-TT between groups A and B，P value was statistically significant as shown in Table 1.

图表编号XD0032748600    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.01.18
作者Tamer Ismail Gawdat、Engy Abd Eltawab Elsherif、Yomna Amr Alahmadawy、Yehia Salah Eldin Mostafa
绘制单位Faculty of Medicine,Cairo University、Memorial Institute of Ophthalmic Research、Faculty of Medicine,Cairo University、Faculty of Medicine,Cairo University
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Comparison of general information between the metastatic group and reactive group》2019.01.06
  2. 《Table 5 Comparison of effectiveness outcomes between esophagus group and cardia group n (%)》2019.01.14
  3. 《Table 6 Comparison of safety outcomes between esophagus group and cardia group》2019.01.14
  4. 《Table 1.Comparison of relevant clinical indicators between high and low NLR group》2019.04.20
  5. 《Table 4.Comparison of MCV and RDW between various groups (mean±SD)》2019.02.20
  6. 《Table 2.Comparison of the expression levels of TGF-β, IL-17 and IL-9 between 2 groups》2019.02.20
  7. 《Table 1.Comparison of clinical features between low calcium group and non-low calcium group》2019.02.20
  8. 《Table 1 Comparison of clinical and pathological characteristics between two groups》2019.04.20
  9. 《Table 3 Comparison of the survival rate, transfer rate and recurrence rate between 2 groups》2019.04.20
  10. 《Table 2 Comparison of acute adverse events between NDP and DDP group》2019.02.20
  11. 《Table 1 Plasma calciumions and 25-hydroxyl vitamin D levels between A and B group (, nmol/L)》2019.01.20
  12. 《Table 2.Comparison of BUT between different groups of patients before and after treatment》2019.01.01
  13. 《Table 6 Comparison of SI between SCI and healthy groups》2019.02.01
  14. 《Table 2.Comparison of the vital signs and pain scores between the two groups》2019.01.01
  15. 《Table 1 Comparison between the two groups (A&B) regarding the four measurements pre-and postoperatively》2019.01.18
  16. 《Table 5Comparison between the operated and non-operated groups.》2018.02.01
  17. 《表4 B组永久修复和复诊时5个参数的比较Table 4 Comparison of 5 parameters of Group B at permanent restoration and a subsequent visit》2018.06.20
  18. 《表2 两组患者治疗前后血脂水平对比 (±s) Table 2 Comparison of blood lipid levels between the two groups before and after treatment (±s)》2018.01.25
  19. 《表2 两组患者治疗前后血清BNP、CRP对比 (±s) Table 2 Comparison of serum BNP and CRP between two groups before and after treatment (±s)》2018.01.25
  20. 《表2 实验组与对照组修复体质量对比Table 2 Quality comparison between experimental group and control group》2018.04.18

随机翻阅

《表4 不同洞径在不同位置处的最大竖向位移》 《表3 主观指标单一评测法的特征对比分析》 《表1 0 回复帖子表：基于PHP+MySql的宿舍管理系统》 《表3 nT、nδ解模糊规则》 《表3 县域间农村人居环境客观条件对比》 《表5 不同O2流量对扩散方阻的影响》 《表3 组成块体结构面参数》 《表3 随DCIS浸润性进展表达持续下调的基因》 《表3每一类样本分类及预测精度》 《表1 两组学生学习动机的比较》