《Table 1 Comparison between the two groups (A&B) regarding the four measurements pre-and postoperati

《Table 1 Comparison between the two groups (A&B) regarding the four measurements pre-and postoperati   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Management of tear trough deformity with and without tear trough-orbicularis retaining ligament complex release in transconjunctival blepharoplasty: a comparative study》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
Lid-TT:Lid margin to tear trough；C-Lid:Distance from center of the pupil to lid margin；Thick-TT:Thickness of tear trough.

Comparison Between the Two Groups Regarding the Four Measurements Pre-and Postoperatively（Quantitative Analysis of Tear Trough）When comparing postoperative C-TT，Lid-TT，Thick-TT between groups A and B，P value was statistically significant as shown in Table 1.

图表编号XD0032748700    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.01.18
作者Tamer Ismail Gawdat、Engy Abd Eltawab Elsherif、Yomna Amr Alahmadawy、Yehia Salah Eldin Mostafa
绘制单位Faculty of Medicine,Cairo University、Memorial Institute of Ophthalmic Research、Faculty of Medicine,Cairo University、Faculty of Medicine,Cairo University
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups》2018.08.20
  2. 《Table 1 Comparison of baseline information between the two groups》2018.08.20
  3. 《Table 1 Comparison of baseline information between the two groups》2018.08.20
  4. 《附表两组患者围术期情况比较Attached table Comparison of perioperation between the two groups》2019.04.01
  5. 《Table 1.Comparison of Clinical Data between the Two Groups》2019.05.01
  6. 《Table 3 Comparison of the 3-years curative effect between two groups》2019.02.20
  7. 《Table 2.Comparison of the vital signs and pain scores between the two groups》2019.01.01
  8. 《Table 2 Comparison between groups A and B regarding patientsatisfaction》2019.01.18
  9. 《Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups (n=80)》2018.06.10
  10. 《表3 两组患者安全性比较[n (%) ]Table 3 The comparison of safety between two groups[n (%) ]》2018.02.10
  11. 《表2 两组患者临床疗效比较Table 2 Comparison of the clinical curative effect between two groups》2018.01.10
  12. 《表4 2组产妇满意率比较Table 4 Comparison of maternal satisfaction rates between the two groups》2018.10.25
  13. 《表2 2组产妇分娩启动、总产程时间以及分娩中转率比较Table 2 The comparison of the delivery index between two groups》2018.08.25
  14. 《表3 2组产妇并发症发生率比较Table 3 The Comparison of the complication between two groups》2018.08.25
  15. 《表2 2组患者临床疗效比较 (n, %) Table 2Comparison the clinical efficacy between two groups (n, %)》2018.04.28
  16. 《表2 两组患者治疗前后血脂水平对比 (±s) Table 2 Comparison of blood lipid levels between the two groups before and after treatment (±s)》2018.01.25
  17. 《表6 两组病人营养状况变化比较Table 6 Comparison of nutritional stauts changes between the two groups》2018.09.10
  18. 《表4 两组EN并发症发生情况比较Table 4 The comparison of enteral nutrition complications between the two groups》2018.03.10
  19. 《表2 两组患者的诊断效果对比 (%) Table 2 Comparison of diagnostic effects between the two groups (%)》2018.08.01
  20. 《表2 两组患者手术相关资料比较Table 2 Comparison of surgical related data between the two groups》2018.08.18

随机翻阅

《表5 银企关联的分组回归结果》 《表3 神经网络方法模型储量误差表》 《表1 系统适用性试验结果》 《附表井冈山地区入侵植物名录》 《表3 覆冰模型热参数：局部对流换热对输电线路高频激励融冰的影响》 《表1 两组近期疗效比较：FOLFOX6方案与XELOX方案治疗胃癌的临床对比研究》 《表4 带有信度结构的情景相似度评估规则库》 《表4 500 MW负荷低压缸振动随真空变化情况》 《表5 风险被检测或发现的可能性 (DET) 评分制》 《表3 影响胃癌患者总生存期的单因素及COX多因素分析》