《Table 6 Comparison of SI between SCI and healthy groups》

《Table 6 Comparison of SI between SCI and healthy groups》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Comparison of walking quality variables between incomplete spinal cord injury patients and healthy subjects by using a footscan plantar pressure system》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
*P<0.05，vs.healthy group（mean±SD；independent-sample t-test）.SI:Symmetry index；SCI:spinal cord injury.

When comparing the symmetry between SCI and healthy groups，the SI of the stance time and the step length were significantly larger in the SCI group than in the healthy group（P<0.05；Table 6）.The symmetry of whole foot plantar Max F，impulse，and contact area were compared between the healthy and SCI groups.In the SCI group，the SI of Max F，impulse and contact area were all significantly larger compared with those in the healthy group（P<0.05；Table 6）.

图表编号XD0040609100    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.02.01
作者Xiang-Nan Yuan、Wei-Di Liang、Feng-Hua Zhou、Han-Ting Li、Li-Xin Zhang、Zhi-Qiang Zhang、Jian-Jun Li
绘制单位Rehabilitation Department, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University、Rehabilitation Department, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University、Rehabilitation Department, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University、Rehabilitation Department, Shengj
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Comparison of general information between the metastatic group and reactive group》2019.01.06
  2. 《Table 5 Comparison of effectiveness outcomes between esophagus group and cardia group n (%)》2019.01.14
  3. 《Table 6 Comparison of safety outcomes between esophagus group and cardia group》2019.01.14
  4. 《Table 1.Comparison of relevant clinical indicators between high and low NLR group》2019.04.20
  5. 《Table 1.Comparison of relevant clinical indicators between high and low NLR group》2019.04.20
  6. 《Table 4.Comparison of MCV and RDW between various groups (mean±SD)》2019.02.20
  7. 《Table 1.Comparison of IgG Subclass between AIHA patients and healthy People》2019.02.20
  8. 《Table 1.Comparison of clinical features between low calcium group and non-low calcium group》2019.02.20
  9. 《Table 1 Comparison of clinical and pathological characteristics between two groups》2019.04.20
  10. 《Table 2 Comparison of acute adverse events between NDP and DDP group》2019.02.20
  11. 《Table 4.Comparison of FL scores between different groups of patients before and after treatment》2019.01.01
  12. 《Table 3.Comparison of SIT between different groups of patients before and after treatment》2019.01.01
  13. 《Table 2.Comparison of BUT between different groups of patients before and after treatment》2019.01.01
  14. 《Table 2 Comparison of median nerve cross-sectional area between diabetics and healthy controls》2019.01.15
  15. 《Table 5 Regional contact area percentage (%) in different regions of SCI and healthy groups》2019.02.01
  16. 《Table 4 Regional impulse percentage (%) in different regions of SCI and healthy groups》2019.02.01
  17. 《Table 1 Demographics of subjects with spinal cord injury (SCI) and healthy subjects》2019.02.01
  18. 《Table 3 Plantar pressure distribution in SCI group and healthy group》2019.02.01
  19. 《Table 2 Spatiotemporal variables in the SCI group and healthy group》2019.02.01
  20. 《表2 冠心病组与健康人组临床资料比较Tab.2 Comparison of clinical data between CAD group and healthy volunteer group》2018.05.20

随机翻阅

《表3 门槛效应检验结果：科技服务业集聚对科技创新的非线性影响研究——基于门槛特征和空间溢出视角》 《表1 黄土高原地区经济发展影响因素指标体系》 《表1 不同生育时期不同种植密度处理对大豆净光合速率新复极差测验》 《表5 温和地区选用门窗配置表》 《表1 各采区空区分布及分级情况》 《表1 样机低空悬停测试数据》 《表1 配比方案：废旧轮胎内钢丝对合成灰铸铁制动盘性能的影响》 《表4 准确度试验结果：火焰原子吸收光谱法测定工作场所空气中钾及其化合物的方法验证》 《表1 抽取微博热点话题并排序》 《表7 2015年3家工业上市公司绩效评估表》