《Table 3 Comparisons of disturbance rejection performances》

《Table 3 Comparisons of disturbance rejection performances》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《PMSM speed control using adaptive sliding mode control based on an extended state observer》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

The load torque of 0.36 N·m acted as the disturbance on the load side.The dynamic response of the speed and q-axis current are shown in Figs 15-17.It is evident that the proposed ASMC+ESO method has a better anti-disturbance capability than the PI and ASMC methods.Compared to the PI and ASMC methods，the ASMC+ESO method gives a smaller fluctuation in speed and a smaller overshoot in q-axis current.In addition，the speed and q-axis current are guaranteed to be restored to their original values much faster.The details of the experimental results are listed in Table 3，which demonstrate that the proposed speed control method enhances the system performance in the presence of load disturbance and alleviates sliding mode chattering effectively.

图表编号XD0020607700    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.12.01
作者刘京、Xia Peipei、Deng Yongting、Li Hongwen、Wang Zhiqian
绘制单位Changchun Institute of Optics,Fine Mechanics and Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences、University of Chinese Academy of Sciences、Changchun Institute of Optics,Fine Mechanics and Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences、University of Chinese Academy of Sciences、C
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《TABLE VIIIEFFECT OF SUGGESTED DISTURBANCE ON MPPT AND INVERTER EFFICIENCIES》2020.07.01
  2. 《表3 系统同时进行4%频率扰动和10%负荷扰动PID参数优化结果Tab.3 The system simultaneously performs 4%frequency disturbance and 10%load disturbance》2019.01.15
  3. 《TABLE I THE UNCERTAINTY OF MODEL PARAMETERS ANDEXTERNAL DISTURBANCES》2019.01.01
  4. 《Table 3 Performance of BIT-3[15]》2019.01.01
  5. 《Table 3.Summary of the statistics for the modeled, AERONET and CARSNET observed AOD comparisons.》2019.01.10
  6. 《表1 比较器性能指标对比Tab.1 Performance index comparisons of comparators》2018.07.20
  7. 《表3 4种扰动信号能量归一化特征向量Table 3 Energy normalized eigenvector of 4kinds of disturbance signals》2018.09.28
  8. 《表4 扰动信号检测结果Table 4 Detection result of disturbance signals》2018.09.28
  9. 《表3 扰动粉土与未扰动粉土粒度的物理性质Table 3 The properties of disturbed and undisturbed silt》2018.04.01
  10. 《Table 2 Comparison of sleep disturbance, anxiety and depression and using self-rating scales between the three groups》2018.08.18
  11. 《Table 2 Comparisons of disturbance rejection performance》2018.12.01
  12. 《表2 压制样泥岩物理力学参数Table 2 The physical and mechanical parameters of disturbed samples》2018.06.01
  13. 《表3 ISSR-PCR反应各因素水平间Duncan多重比较Table 3 Duncan multiple comparisons of factors at different levels of ISSR-PCR reaction》2018.03.28
  14. 《表2 阶段Ⅰ数据受到污染环境下的CUSUM控制图性能比较Tab.2 Performance comparisons of the CUSUM charts when various disturbances present in phase》2018.11.01
  15. 《表2 阶段Ⅰ数据受到污染环境下的CUSUM控制图性能比较Tab.2 Performance comparisons of the CUSUM charts when various disturbances present in phase》2018.11.01
  16. 《表1 无污染环境下的CUSUM控制图性能比较Tab.1 Performance comparisons of the CUSUM charts under uncontaminated normal environment》2018.11.01
  17. 《表1 查询性能对比Tab.1 Comparisons of spatial query performance》2018.02.25
  18. 《表3 5种药剂对番茄种子发芽率影响的多重比较Table 3 The results of multiple comparisons of five reagents multiple comparison effect of germina》2018.05.30
  19. 《表1 本文提出的DAC与同类DAC性能参数比较Tab.1 Comparisons of performance parameters between the DAC proposed in this paper and the simila》2018.10.03
  20. 《Table 1.Statistics (period, number, and mean duration) of heavy rainfall–related disturbances over the nYHRB and sYHRB r》2018.11.16

随机翻阅

《表8 读者对图书分布情况和排列规则的了解情况》 《表1 测试案例列表：基于SVA的AFDX网络MAC IP核功能验证》 《表1 第1盆插穗生根情况》 《表1 50批次祛痘类化妆品抽检基本情况表》 《表1 大黄素对UGT1A1的影响 (n=3)》 《表1 各元素测量谱线波长和观测方式》 《表2 两组患者治疗前后SV、LVEF和6 min步行距离结果比较 (±s)》 《表3 不同文献报道中国儿童茶碱的氨茶碱血浆清除率与半衰期》 《表1 特种冶炼技术课时分配》 《表1 同步采样值比较：一种闪变测量的信号采样方法》