《Table 2 Comparisons of disturbance rejection performance》

《Table 2 Comparisons of disturbance rejection performance》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《PMSM speed control using adaptive sliding mode control based on an extended state observer》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

The speed command is set to be 800 r/min，and the load disturbance Tl=0.36 N·m is added abruptly at t=0.1s and removed at t=0.2s.The simulation results of the speed response and q-axis current response with the three methods are shown in Figs 7-9.The details of simulation results with respect to the three methods are shown in Table 2.

图表编号XD0020607600    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.12.01
作者刘京、Xia Peipei、Deng Yongting、Li Hongwen、Wang Zhiqian
绘制单位Changchun Institute of Optics,Fine Mechanics and Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences、University of Chinese Academy of Sciences、Changchun Institute of Optics,Fine Mechanics and Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences、University of Chinese Academy of Sciences、C
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《TABLE VIIIEFFECT OF SUGGESTED DISTURBANCE ON MPPT AND INVERTER EFFICIENCIES》2020.07.01
  2. 《TABLE I THE UNCERTAINTY OF MODEL PARAMETERS ANDEXTERNAL DISTURBANCES》2019.01.01
  3. 《表1 比较器性能指标对比Tab.1 Performance index comparisons of comparators》2018.07.20
  4. 《表3 4种扰动信号能量归一化特征向量Table 3 Energy normalized eigenvector of 4kinds of disturbance signals》2018.09.28
  5. 《表4 扰动信号检测结果Table 4 Detection result of disturbance signals》2018.09.28
  6. 《表2 扰动粉土与未扰动粉土微观结构定量参数Table 2 The microstructure quantitative parameters of disturbed and undisturbed silt》2018.04.01
  7. 《表3 扰动粉土与未扰动粉土粒度的物理性质Table 3 The properties of disturbed and undisturbed silt》2018.04.01
  8. 《表2 几种方法LS指标比较Table 2 Quality comparisons in terms of LS》2018.04.01
  9. 《Table 2 Comparisons between physician and pharma professional responses for area of perceived need and how they would ex》2018.05.18
  10. 《Table 2 Comparison of sleep disturbance, anxiety and depression and using self-rating scales between the three groups》2018.08.18
  11. 《表4 成像结果对比Table 4 Comparisons of imaging results》2018.08.01
  12. 《Table 3 Comparisons of disturbance rejection performances》2018.12.01
  13. 《表2 压制样泥岩物理力学参数Table 2 The physical and mechanical parameters of disturbed samples》2018.06.01
  14. 《表2 各模型计算结果对比Table 2 Comparisons of the calculated results of different models》2018.10.01
  15. 《表2 阶段Ⅰ数据受到污染环境下的CUSUM控制图性能比较Tab.2 Performance comparisons of the CUSUM charts when various disturbances present in phase》2018.11.01
  16. 《表2 阶段Ⅰ数据受到污染环境下的CUSUM控制图性能比较Tab.2 Performance comparisons of the CUSUM charts when various disturbances present in phase》2018.11.01
  17. 《表1 无污染环境下的CUSUM控制图性能比较Tab.1 Performance comparisons of the CUSUM charts under uncontaminated normal environment》2018.11.01
  18. 《表1 查询性能对比Tab.1 Comparisons of spatial query performance》2018.02.25
  19. 《表1 本文提出的DAC与同类DAC性能参数比较Tab.1 Comparisons of performance parameters between the DAC proposed in this paper and the simila》2018.10.03
  20. 《Table 1.Statistics (period, number, and mean duration) of heavy rainfall–related disturbances over the nYHRB and sYHRB r》2018.11.16

随机翻阅

《表6 大学生信息素养在所属年级间两两Mann-Whitney检验统计量a》 《表4 检测结果：浅谈一种提升陶瓷砖表面防滑性能的工艺方法》 《表1 两组患者满意度的对比分析表[n(%)]》 《表2 产品实测值与设计值的对比表》 《表2 两组患者毛发浓密程度生长方向以及治疗满意度调查结果对比》 《表3 T型燃烧器试验数据分析结果》 《表2 两组患者的并发症发生率比较[例（%）]》 《表1 2组手术时间、住院时间及骨折愈合时间比较 (±s)》 《表8 包含与不包含金融发展水平因素下信贷对通胀的冲击效应比较》 《表8“省直管县”政策效果的强弱县差异》