《Table 9 Individual class accuracies by PA and UA for Stockholm data》

《Table 9 Individual class accuracies by PA and UA for Stockholm data》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《D-SS Frame: deep spectral-spatial feature extraction and fusion for classification of panchromatic and multispectral images》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

The ground truth map of‘Washington DC’and‘Stockholm’data[14]were constructed.In each labeled scene，the black area represents the unlabeled area.Different values of the SSAE and SAE parameters were experimented，and Tables 3，4，5，6 list the classification accuracy of（SSAE+SVM）and（SAE+SVM）for MS and PAN images of Washington DC and Stockholm data respectively，versus the number of neurons in a hidden layer.

图表编号XD0020606700    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.12.01
作者Teffahi Hanane、Yao Hongxun
绘制单位School of Computer Science and Technology,Harbin Institute of Technology、Algerian Space Agency、School of Computer Science and Technology,Harbin Institute of Technology
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 3–Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherm for TMA adsorption by coir pith, lignin and holocellulose extracted》2019.05.15
  2. 《Table 2 Parameters for kinetics models for Pb and Cd sorption by modified dairy manure biochar (MBC) and biochar produce》2019.01.20
  3. 《Table 2 Confusion matrix and accuracy assessment for the surface characteristic classes of Badain Jaran Desert in 2015》2019.02.01
  4. 《Table 4 Confusion matrix and accuracy assessment for the surface characteristic classes of Ulan Buh Desert in 2015》2019.02.01
  5. 《Table 3 Confusion matrix and accuracy assessment for the surface characteristic classes of Tengger Desert》2019.02.01
  6. 《Table 1Crosslinking degree for t PA copolymer and t PA/HEA-f-MWCNT composites》2019.02.01
  7. 《Table 2 Cosinor values for group and individual self-feeding activities》2019.01.01
  8. 《Table 3–Basal emission rates andβcoefficients for BVOCs emitted by Pinus tabuliformis.》2019.07.15
  9. 《Table 4 User’s and producer’s accuracy of each class》2018.03.25
  10. 《Table 6 Classification accuracies from different of hidden sizes for PAN-Stockholm data》2018.12.01
  11. 《Table 5 Classification accuracies from different of hidden sizes for MS-Stockholm data》2018.12.01
  12. 《Table 8 Individual class accuracies by PA and UA for Washington DC data》2018.12.01
  13. 《Table 2 Ground reference classes of Stockholm data[15]》2018.12.01
  14. 《Table 2Adequacy, sensitivity and accuracy rates for lesions stratified by size.》2018.02.01
  15. 《Table 4 Description of data used for image classification and accuracy assessment》2018.12.01
  16. 《Table 3 Normalized crop yield variation indicated by CV for different years and RV as explained by different MZ approach》2018.12.01
  17. 《Table 1–Heritability (h2) and prediction accuracy (rMG) estimated for agronomic traits, and their Pearson's correlation》2018.08.01
  18. 《Table 2Accuracy and precision results for five analytes in microdilysates at concentrations of LLOQ (n=6) .》2018.04.18
  19. 《表3 患者识别各算法响度补偿语音的正确率Table 3 Accuracy of the speech compensated by the algorithms for the patients》2018.08.01
  20. 《Table 3.Fitting parameters for As adsorption by Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm models》2018.10.01

随机翻阅

《表1：论北宋词人贺铸命运的悲剧性意义》 《表3 患者安全文化优势及劣势领域条目排序（n=825)》 《表2 不同掺杂量的稻米油指纹图谱相似度及相对误差数值》 《表3 陕西省居民健康素养影响因素的多因素Logistic回归分析》 《表2 实验组与对照组患儿退热时间，咳嗽、咳痰消失时间-及住院时间比较(d,±s)》 《表1 2组患者临床疗效比较[例 (%) ]》 《表1 给定位姿与计算位姿之间的对比》 《表1 不同楼层新兵宿舍空气菌落总数监测结果》 《表2 各组儿童基线情况Tab.2 Baseline characteristics of children in 3 groups》 《表6 新闻传播学领域“一带一路”研究高频关键词中心性表 (部分)》