《Table 1 Comparison of reproductive performance between different generations of Muchuan black-bone

《Table 1 Comparison of reproductive performance between different generations of Muchuan black-bone   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Production Performance of Different Generations of Muchuan Blackbone Chicken》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

As shown in Table 1，compared with those of the G0，the age at first egg of the G1was 4 d earlier，the egg weight increased by 5.83%，the number of eggs laid in 500 d increased by 4.74%，the fertilization rate increased by 3.0%，the hatch rate of fertilized eggs increased by 3.2%，and the survival rate during the brooding period increased by 3.7%.

图表编号XD00182610100    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.08.01
作者Mohan QIU、Zengrong ZHANG、Xiaosong JIANG、Huarui DU、Qingyun LI、Chunlin YU、Xia XIONG、Lihe ZOU、Chaowu YANG
绘制单位Animal Breeding and Genetics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province,Sichuan Animal Science Academy、Animal Breeding and Genetics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province,Sichuan Animal Science Academy、Animal Breeding and Genetics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province,S
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Performance comparison of different data augmentation methods》2021.01.20
  2. 《Table 1 Comparison of 150-day weight between different mink varieties》2018.10.01
  3. 《Table 2 Test results of reproductive performance of rats》2018.08.01
  4. 《Table 4.Comparison of FL scores between different groups of patients before and after treatment》2019.01.01
  5. 《Table 3.Comparison of SIT between different groups of patients before and after treatment》2019.01.01
  6. 《Table 2.Comparison of BUT between different groups of patients before and after treatment》2019.01.01
  7. 《Table 1.Performance comparison of PSCs without or with different interlayers.》2019.01.01
  8. 《Table 1 Comparison of 4 algorithms.error concealment performance for different packet loss rates (PSNR, SSIM) 表1 4种算法在不同》2019.01.01
  9. 《Table 1 The analytical performance of ZnO-rGrO-PB/MCPE in comparison with different electrodes》2019.02.01
  10. 《表2 不同智能算法的对比Table 2 Performance comparison of different intelligent algorithms》2018.07.30
  11. 《表2 不同构型的性能参数对比Table 2 Comparison of performance parameters for different configurations》2018.08.28
  12. 《表2 传统涡轮风扇发动机和脉冲爆震涡轮风扇发动机的性能对比Table 2 Comparison of performance between conventional turbofan engine and pulse detonation》2018.02.28
  13. 《表2 基于光谱数据不同方法分类性能对比Table 2 Comparison of performance in different methods》2018.09.01
  14. 《Table-1 The comparison between EL performances of two devices with TPD/Eu (DBM) bath and TPD/TPD:Eu (DBM) bath/Eu (DBM)》2018.04.10
  15. 《Table 1 Comparison between different types of energy storage[11, 12].》2018.08.01
  16. 《Table 1 Comparison of performance with different modified electrodes》2018.04.10
  17. 《表4 不同算法性能比较Table 4 Performance comparison of different methods》2018.03.25
  18. 《表4 排序方法性能比较Table 4 Performance comparison of different sorting methods》2018.02.10
  19. 《表4 不同计算方法的精度对比Table 4 Comparison of calculated accuracy between different methods》2018.01.25
  20. 《表4 算法性能比较Table 4 Comparison of performance of different algorithms》2018.10.10

随机翻阅

《表6 模型预测相对准确率》 《表3 对西瓜产量性状影响》 《表1 数学认知水平分析框架》 《表1 实验所用的表面活性剂》 《表6 桩顶压力传感器参数》 《表2 实验组接受团体辅导后一般自我效能感前后自评比较》 《表1 抚河流域与抚州市不同部门用水比例的年际变化》 《表1 南方水稻幼苗阶段平均种植密度对比》 《表2 肝衰竭各组和对照组的人口统计学信息*》 《表1 正弦信号相位与幅度的关系表》