《Table 5.As in Table 2 but for Guantao station.》

《Table 5.As in Table 2 but for Guantao station.》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Subdaily to Seasonal Change of Surface Energy and Water Flux of the Haihe River Basin in China: Noah and Noah-MP Assessment》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
Notes:all correlation coefficients passed the 95%confidence test.The MBE and RMSE are inC.

The simulated and observed daily mean surface fluxes at Guantao station are illustrated in Fig.12.The soil heat flux and net radiation simulations generally agree with the observations with respect to the magnitude and seasonal variations.However，the sensible and latent heat flux seem to show more discrepancies.In particular，distinctly underestimated latent heat could be found in both LSMs（Table 5）.Noah LSM underestimates the sensible heat flux（MBE=-1.94 W m-2），while Noah-MP shows slight improvements（MBE=-0.04W m-2）.

图表编号XD0030265200    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.01.10
作者Fuqiang YANG、Li DAN、Jing PENG、Xiujing YANG、Yueyue LI、Dongdong GAO
绘制单位Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment for Temperate East Asia,Institute of Atmospheric Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences、University of Chinese Academy of Sciences、Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment for Temperate East Asia,Institute
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《表2 锦屏二级水电站大理岩力学参数Table 2 mechanical parameter of marble for Jinping II hydropower station》2018.02.01
  2. 《表3 地铁车站火灾安全评价表Table 3 Fire safety assessment table for subway station》2018.06.25
  3. 《Table 1 Information for meteorological and rainfall stations》2019.03.01
  4. 《Table 1 Basic information of the hydrological stations located in the LRB》2019.02.01
  5. 《Table 3.Same as table 2 but for Hato (No.1713)》2019.03.01
  6. 《Table 1.Water quality at the stations (in situ measurement)》2019.01.01
  7. 《Table 3.As in Table 2 but for Huailai station.》2019.01.10
  8. 《Table 4.As in Table 2 but for Daxing station.》2019.01.10
  9. 《Table 2 PAR data in December,2015 at the Sub-Center for Atmosphere station》2017.03.01
  10. 《Table 1 Weibull parameters for daily extreme wind gusts with fitted curves for 12 typical stations》2018.10.01
  11. 《Table 2 Differences of the mean and maximum values for combinations of starting indices at stations in northern China》2018.04.01
  12. 《Table 4 Differences of the mean and maximum values for combinations of length indices at stations in northern China》2018.04.01
  13. 《Table 3 Differences of the mean and maximum values for combinations of ending indices at stations in northern China》2018.04.01
  14. 《表3 定点台站基本信息统计表Tab.3 Statistical table of basic information for fixex stations》2018.07.01
  15. 《Table 4.Summary of the GF at the study stations for the wind speed regime between 2 and 6 m s-1.Daytime:1000–1600 LST (l》2018.03.10
  16. 《表2 4个监测站点天然牧草营养成分Table 2 Nutrients of natural herbage in four stations》2018.08.20
  17. 《表6 不同方案下乌拉斯台站径流的预测结果Table 6 Runoff prediction errors for Wulasitai Station by different methods》2018.08.01
  18. 《表5 乌拉斯台站径流RBF神经网络预测结果Table 5 Runoff predictions for Wulasitai Station by RBF neural network》2018.08.01
  19. 《表3 乌拉斯台径流预报因子的优选结果Table 3 Optimized predictors for runoff at Wulasitai Station》2018.08.01
  20. 《表2 直传模式地球站可见性概率Table 2 Visibility probability of earth station in direct transmission mode》2018.04.01

随机翻阅

《表1 VR、AR与MR的对比》 《表4 不同林龄杉木人工林土壤养分含量》 《表1 设备运行与失效间隔情况(d)》 《表2 旅游具身体验研究的核心范畴及代表文献》 《表1 日本IGS系列卫星情况》 《表3 金花葵中相对含量超过1%的黄酮类物质》 《表2 两组生活质量情况比较[n (%) ]》 《表1 发生不良事件的常见药物名称、剂型、发生次数、不合理原因》 《表3 两组患者治疗后的并发症发生率比较[n (%) ]》 《表3 问卷调查内容(选项略)》