《Table 1 Performance comparison》

《Table 1 Performance comparison》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《A tunable passive mixer for SAW-less front-end with reconfigurable voltage conversion gain and intermediate frequency bandwidth》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

This paper reports the design of a tunable mixer for multi-mode multi-standard（MMMS）applications，and the circuit is implemented in TSMC 0.18μm RF CMOS process.The adjustable mixer switches have been proposed in order to reconfigure the VCG flexibly.A LO frequency-tunable high-Q filter transfering at LNA output can reject out-of-band interferences.Furthermore the IF BW can be reconfigurable by using different CBB.Measurement results indicate that the designed mixer can provide low NF and high linearity over wideband in the applications of MMMS wireless communications.

图表编号XD0020596700    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.03.01
作者陶健、Fan Xiangning、Zhao Yuan
绘制单位Institute of RF&OE-ICs,School of Information Science and Engineering,Southeast University、Institute of RF&OE-ICs,School of Information Science and Engineering,Southeast University、Institute of RF&OE-ICs,School of Information Science and Engineering,Southe
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Performance comparison of different data augmentation methods》2021.01.20
  2. 《Table 4 Comparison of total performance》2019.08.01
  3. 《Table 3 Performance comparison表3性能对比》2019.03.01
  4. 《Table 1.Performance comparison of PSCs without or with different interlayers.》2019.01.01
  5. 《Table 3 Performance comparison》2019.02.01
  6. 《Table 2 Performance comparison表2性能对比》2019.01.01
  7. 《Table 2 Performance comparison of segmentation algorithms》2019.01.25
  8. 《表1 性能指标检测对比表Tab.1 Performance index comparison table》2019.01.30
  9. 《Table 1 Comparison of performance parameters among several Rem-meters》2019.07.01
  10. 《Table 1.Performance Comparison of Several Typical Integrated ODLs》2018.10.10
  11. 《Table 2 Comparisons of disturbance rejection performance》2018.12.01
  12. 《Table 1 Comparison of performance with different modified electrodes》2018.04.10
  13. 《表4 经济性能对比Table 4 Comparison of economic performance》2018.02.01
  14. 《表5 动力性能对比Table 5 Comparison of dynamic performance》2018.02.01
  15. 《表3 算法性能对比Table 3 Algorithm performance comparison》2018.01.25
  16. 《表5 性能对比Table 5 Performance comparison》2018.06.01
  17. 《Table 1 Performance comparison of forecasting results with15min ahead》2018.12.01
  18. 《表1 CFAR性能对比表Tab.1 The table of CFAR performance comparison》2018.10.31
  19. 《表7 模型性能对比Table 7 Model performance Comparison》2018.06.01
  20. 《表3 性能对比Table 3 Performance comparison》2018.07.10

随机翻阅

《表4 教育者作为创新者与设计者应达成的目标要求》 《表2 2组患者的PSQI评分比较(±s，分)》 《表3 变量描述性统计分析结果》 《表3 LCQ评分变化(±s，分)》 《表1 小微企业人民币贷款占比情况》 《表3 阴极铜含银变化：金隆铜电解精炼生产实践》 《表2 贵州不同种源棕榈根系各指标的比较》 《表3 种植8年的山杜英和黄山栾树树高方差分析》 《表7 极限状态下混凝土的应力》 《表1 样本商业银行资产负债分项结构（单位：%）》