《Table 2 Quality assessment for cross-sectional study in this meta-analysis》

  提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式

本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现

《Risk analysis of diabetes mellitus in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a meta-analysis》

1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录

1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

A study can be awarded a maximum of one or two stars for eachnumbered item within the Selection and Outcome categories.A maximumof two stars can be given for Comparability.

In this study，we included 223 studies from the primary search.After reviewing titles and abstracts of all these studies，we excluded 207 studies that do not meet our inclusion criteria.After a full-text review of the rest of16 studies，only 4 studies met our inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis[6，13-15].The process is summarized in Figure 1.All studies with 5，362 patients with hidradenitis suppurativa and 23，193 participants with nonhidradenitis suppurativa were identified and included in the data analysis.Two cross-sectional studies and two case-control studies reported adjusted OR，but one study[15]by author Miller IM et al was consisted of 2cross-sectional design aspects and analyzed as 2studies for this meta-analysis（Miller IM a and Miller IM b）.Two studies did reveal an increased risk of diabetes mellitus incidence among patients with hidradenitis suppurativa[14-15]，However，but another two studies showed that there is no association between hidradenitis suppurativa and diabetes mellitus[6，13].Crosssectional studies had a total stars of 7（high quality，Shalom G et al[14]），4（medium-quality，Miller IM a[15]）and 5（medium-quality，Miller IM b[15]），respectively.Case-control studies had a total stars of 5（mediumquality，Revuz JE[6]）and 7（high quality，Shlyankevich J[13]）.The clinical characteristics and NewcastleOttawa scales of these included studies are described in Table 1，Table 2 and Table 3.