《Table 1 Rater experience level and time between the test occasions》

《Table 1 Rater experience level and time between the test occasions》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Inter-and intra-rater reliability of vertebral fracture classifications in the Swedish fracture register》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
Raters 1，2 and 5 were actively working with classifications and vertebral fractures in the time between the tests while Raters 3，4，6 and 7 were not.

Inter-rater reliability mean kappa was 0.54（0.26-0.70）for the cervical fracture classifications（C1-Th1）and 0.51（0.18-0.69）for the thoracolumbar fracture classification（Th2-L5）.Inter-rater reliability for individual raters is presented in Table3.

图表编号XD0059012500    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.01.18
作者David Morgonskld、Victoria Warkander、Panayiotis Savvides、Axel Wihlborg、Mathilde Bouzereau、Hans Mller、Paul Gerdhem
绘制单位Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet、Department of Orthopaedics, Danderyd Hospital、Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet、Department of Orthopaedics,Karolinska Unive
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Factors and levels of the experiment》2018.06.01
  2. 《表2 安全疏散的人数与时间的关系Table 2 The relationship between number and time of safe evacuation》2018.04.25
  3. 《Table 1 Contingency table to test the independence between sperm collection success and the birds’behaviour》2019.03.01
  4. 《Table 2.Comparison of the expression levels of TGF-β, IL-17 and IL-9 between 2 groups》2019.02.20
  5. 《表1 转速的理论值与实验值对比结果Tab.1 The comparison result table between the theoretical value and the experimental value of the rotat》2019.01.22
  6. 《Table 2 Regional correlations and signifi cance levels between the winter mean SIC and SST fi elds in the ice-covered su》2019.01.01
  7. 《Table 8 Correlations between different preoperative factors and the survival time of the initial procedure》2019.04.18
  8. 《Table 1 The association between LINE-1 methylation level and high myopia》2019.01.18
  9. 《Table 1 The factors and levels of response surface experiment》2019.02.01
  10. 《表4 因素与水平Table 4 Factors and levels of the test》2018.03.20
  11. 《表2 实验反思与实验各单元的关系Table 2 The relationship between experimental reflection and experiment content》2018.08.02
  12. 《表5 Q-test测试项目难度平均值Table 5 Correspondence between difficulty of items and levels of quantitative abilities》2018.01.02
  13. 《表2 因素与水平实验设计Table 2 Factors and levels of the experiments》2018.04.01
  14. 《表3 正交试验因素水平表Table 3 The factor and level of orthogonal test》2018.06.25
  15. 《Table 1 List ofδD andδ18O test results and water level elevation in the research area》2018.12.01
  16. 《表5 白洋淀水位与周边渗漏量关系Table 5 The relationship between the water level of Baiyangdian Wetlands and the surrounding leakage》2018.09.01
  17. 《Table 1.Correlation coefficients between the NTAB and the STAB time series.Numbers in bold are significant at the 95%con》2018.03.10
  18. 《Table 4 Factors and levels in the L9 (34) orthogonal experiment (g·L-1)》2018.04.30
  19. 《Table 13Robustness test of dependent and independent variables replaced at the same time.》2018.12.01
  20. 《表2 试验及因素水平Table 2 Two factors and the levels in the experiment scheme》2018.03.30

随机翻阅

《表4 厦门环岛路区域主要一年生草本的叶色色度分级》 《表1 人居环境舒适度等级划分表》 《表1 ABC和MABC优化结果比较》 《表1 AZ31B镁合金化学成分》 《表1 2015年11月21日05:00-20:00观象台、怀柔天气现象演变》 《表2 农业保险公司和农户博弈收益情况》 《表1 复垦样地基本情况》 《表6 硬脂酸镁用量优化 (mg)》 《表5 补偿前后最大偏移对比》 《表1 超导磁体主要设计参数Tab.1 The main design parameters of superconducting magnet》