《Table 7 The relative error norm and CPU time of the DSEFG and the IEFG methods》
提示:宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名:随高清版一同展现
《The dimension splitting element-free Galerkin method for 3D transient heat conduction problems》
The relative error norms and CPU times of the DSEFG method,IEFG method,and FEM at different times t are shown in Table 4,with 10×10×10 cubic elements with 8nodes being used in FEM.FEM is shown to be faster than the DSEFG method,which has greater computational accuracy than the IEFG method and FEM.
图表编号 | XD0052896100 严禁用于非法目的 |
---|---|
绘制时间 | 2019.04.01 |
作者 | ZhiJuan Meng、Heng Cheng、LiDong Ma、YuMin Cheng |
绘制单位 | Shanghai Institute of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Mechanics in Energy Engineering,Shanghai University、School of Applied Science, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology、Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Unive |
更多格式 | 高清、无水印(增值服务) |
查看“Table 7 The relative error norm and CPU time of the DSEFG and the IEFG methods”的人还看了
- Table 6 The relative error norm and CPU time of the DSEFG and IEFG methods under different node distributions
- 表2 16批样品共有峰相对保留时间及相对峰面积Tab.2 The relative retention time and relative peak areas of common peaks of sixteen batches of s