《Table 2.Comparison of Hemodynamic Data in Septic Shock Patients between Groups (±s)》

《Table 2.Comparison of Hemodynamic Data in Septic Shock Patients between Groups (±s)》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Effect of Shen-Fu Injection(参附注射液)on Hemodynamics in Early Volume Resuscitation Treated Septic Shock Patients》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
Notes:P<0.05 vs.0 h in the same group；△P<0.05 vs.control group at the same time point

There was no statistical difference of patients'MAP and HR between SFI and control groups at 0 h（P>0.05）.After treatment，MAP was increased and HR decreased significantly at 12 and 24 h in both groups（P<0.05）.Compared with the control group，the change of MAP and HR in the SFI group was significantly greater at 12 and 24 h（P<0.05，Table 2）.

图表编号XD0049342200    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.01.01
作者FAN Kai-liang、WANG Jun-hui、KONG Li、ZHANG Fei-hu、HAO Hao、ZHAO Hao、TIAN Zheng-yun、YIN Ming-xin、FANG Hua、YANG Hui-hui、LIU Yang
绘制单位Department of Emergency, the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine、First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine、Department of Emergency, the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 3 Multivariable analysis of risk factors for development of venous thromboembolism in patients with hepatic cirrho》2019.04.27
  2. 《Table 3.Comparison of Blood Gas Indices in Septic Shock Patients between Groups (±s)》2019.01.01
  3. 《Table 1.Baseline Characteristics of Septic Shock Patients on Admission》2019.01.01
  4. 《Table 1 Demographic and patient-referred data》2019.02.01
  5. 《表2 气囊冲击实验动态特性数据Tab.2 Dynamic characteristic data of air spring in shock test》2019.02.01
  6. 《表4 不同比例距离处冲击波测试数据Tab.4 The test data of explosive shock wave parameters in different distance》2019.02.01
  7. 《Table 2.Comparison of experimental data and numerical results.》2019.02.01
  8. 《Table 2 Comparison of results with the original NCEP/NCAR temperature data》2017.03.25
  9. 《表2 ACAS1与ACAS2血流动力学指标比较 (±s) Table 2 Comparison of hemodynamic parameters between ACAS1 and ACAS2 (±s)》2018.09.01
  10. 《Table 6Comparison of the shock wave and bubble pulse properties in the numerical analysis case and in the experiment》2018.08.25
  11. 《表2 激波控制前后叶型性能参数对比Table 2 Comparison of performance parameters with and without shock control method》2018.05.01
  12. 《Table 3 The ORL, RPE layer thickness in healthy individuals and diabetic patient groups in terms of any measurement》2018.12.18
  13. 《表3 4组患者不同时间的血流动力学指标比较 (±s) Table 3 Comparison of hemodynamic parameters in four groups of patients at different time (±s》2018.09.25
  14. 《表2 两组患者临床资料比较Table 2 Comparison of clinical data between two groups》2018.08.10
  15. 《Table 1Patient characteristics and perioperative data.》2018.12.15
  16. 《表2 两组患者血气分析及血液动力学指标对比 (±s) Table 2 Comparison of blood gas analysis and hemodynamic indexes between two groups (±s)》2018.01.25
  17. 《表2 两组病人主要观察指标的比较[n (%) ]Table 2 Comparison of primary observable data in two groups[n (%) ]》2018.03.10
  18. 《表2 某传染病医院2017年5—12月与2016年同期相比医疗指标变化情况Table 2 Comparison of the changes of medical index data in an infectious hospital b》2018.06.30
  19. 《表2 无量纲化冲击响应谱峰值对比Table 2 Comparison of dimensionless shock response spectrum peak》2018.07.25
  20. 《表2 各算法语音增强后LSD数据对比Table 2 Comparison of the enhanced speech LSD data in the algorithms》2018.08.01

随机翻阅

《表4 07样本多变量检测》 《表4 高管团队能力特征、股票期权与企业研发投入回归结果》 《表2 高中介中心性文献信息（按中介中心性排序）》 《表9 N、K回归分析因素分析》 《表2 试验电池基本特性：基于向量式多遗忘因子最小二乘法的城轨列车储能元件充放电参数辨识》 《表1计算工况：荷载变化对桩基受力影响的技术研究》 《表1 两组患者临床效果比较[例(%)]》 《表1 两组孕产妇护理前后生产方式意向比较[n(%)]》 《表1 妇产科围手术期预防使用抗菌药物点评标准》 《表2 各组大鼠血清炎症因子水平比较》