《Table 2 Number of samples for each soil type correctly classified in the conventional soil map and

《Table 2 Number of samples for each soil type correctly classified in the conventional soil map and   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Updating conventional soil maps by mining soil–environment relationships from individual soil polygons》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

The number of samples correctly classified with the proposed method is six more than that with the reference method（Table 2）.Most of the accuracy improvement occurred in the Churchtown map unit，which contains only one soil type and accounts for 13.9%of the total study area.Here，the Churchtown map unit was taken as an example to discuss the performance of the proposed method in more detail.

图表编号XD0047429700    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.02.20
作者CHENG Wei、ZHU A-xing、QIN Cheng-zhi、QI Feng
绘制单位State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences、University of Chinese Academy of Sciences、State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmen
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《表1 样品编号及制备各样品的反应物Tab.1 Sample number and reactant for preparation of each sample》2018.02.01
  2. 《Table 1 Comparison on the chemical properties of soil samples cultivated with garden plants for over 3 years and less th》2018.06.01
  3. 《Table 3 Detection efficiency and average count rate of each ring for U30-mm sample》2019.08.01
  4. 《Table 8 The performance of parent material value extraction for the descriptive text of soil types with the conditional》2019.02.20
  5. 《Table 10 The performance of landform value extraction for the descriptive text of soil types with the conditional random》2019.02.20
  6. 《Table 2 Average runoff coefficient for each ecosystem type》2019.02.01
  7. 《Table 1.Criteria for sero-panel sample classification》2019.02.20
  8. 《Table 1 Optimized Values ofχ*andη*for each atom type with including the effect of the local chemical environments in fra》2019.01.15
  9. 《Table 2 Feature number of each method in binary classification表2 二分类特征选择特征数目》2019.01.01
  10. 《Table 3 Feature number of each method in multi-class classification表3多分类特征选择特征数目》2019.01.01
  11. 《Table 1.Number of operational days in each month for the Kunming meteor radar》2019.03.01
  12. 《表2 各分量的游程总数Tab.2 The Total Number of Runs for Each Component》2019.02.20
  13. 《Table 3 Standards for classification of soil available nutrients in the citrus orchards》2019.02.01
  14. 《表2 样品在各分类水平上的序列数Table 2 The sequence number of the samples at each classification level》2018.08.25
  15. 《表2 各样品所含OTUs数及序列数统计Table 2 The number of OTUs and the number of sequences contained in each sample》2018.03.20
  16. 《表8 各样本点对应的最优铺层比例及子层数Table 8 Optimal ply volume proportion and number of sub-laminates for each sample point》2018.05.28
  17. 《表4 各监测点的校正因子及校正效果1) Table 4 Correction factors and corrected results for each monitoring site》2018.04.15
  18. 《Table 2 The proportional ratio between sandy paleosol samples and sand samples for each grain size fraction extracted by》2018.10.01
  19. 《表1 影响各性状的非遗传因素的水平数和样本大小Table 1 Level and sample number of non-genetic factors influencing each trait》2018.06.20
  20. 《Table 2 Number of sample plots by soil depth category and tree species used in the development of the longitudinal heigh》2018.06.01

随机翻阅

《表1 铝合金材料的静强度数值》 《表1 各变量的平均数、标准差和相关系数》 《表1 古塔多遇地震工况下各关键点位移峰值》 《表5 第二阶段SFA回归结果》 《表2 两组患者治疗前后MCV、SCV比较 (±s, m/s)》 《表4 番禺区高中生学业自我效能感在性别方面的差异性分析》 《表1 两组受检者张口位X线片动态对比[n, %]》 《表5 回归方程中自变量的显著性分析》 《表6 百色水库灌区新建骨干工程贷款能力测算方案成果表》 《表2 2 组产后2 h、24 h平均出血量比较 (, mL)》