《Table 2Toxicity assessment of B.thuringiensis 29.118 to mice by bone marrow micronucleus assay》

《Table 2Toxicity assessment of B.thuringiensis 29.118 to mice by bone marrow micronucleus assay》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《传统发酵食品臭鳜鱼中分离的苏云金芽孢杆菌(Bacillus thuringiensis 29.118)的毒理学评价（英文）》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
Note:**.significantly different from the negative control group（P<0.01）.

To determine the extent of chromosomal damage in vivo，bone marrow cell micronucleus assay was used to evaluate the safety of B.thuringiensis 29.118 on mice.Compared to the negative control，there was no significant difference in the micronucleus rate among the treatment groups（P>0.05）（Table 2） .Both the male mice and the female mice exhibited the same trend based on the analysis of difference.The difference of micronucleus rate between positive control and low-dose existed statistically significant（P<0.01）.No significant difference was found among the low-dose，medium-dose and high-dose.

图表编号XD0041253700    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.02.15
作者杨培周、朱星星、操丽丽、郑志、程杰顺、姜绍通
绘制单位合肥工业大学食品与生物工程学院安徽省农产品精深加工省级实验室、合肥工业大学食品与生物工程学院安徽省农产品精深加工省级实验室、合肥工业大学食品与生物工程学院安徽省农产品精深加工省级实验室、合肥工业大学食品与生物工程学院安徽省农产品精深加工省级实验室、合肥工业大学食品与生物工程学院安徽省农产品精深加工省级实验室、合肥工业大学食品与生物工程学院安徽省农产品精深加工省级实验室
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 2–The toxicity of TUDCA after a single intravenous injection to mice (n=3) .》2018.03.01
  2. 《Table 1–The toxicity of NK after a single intravenous injection to mice (n=3) .》2018.03.01
  3. 《Table 1 Effect of TGP on hepatosomatic index of mice》2018.08.01
  4. 《Table 2 Assessment of high-risk population for five types of cancer from 2012 to 2018(n,%)》2019.11.05
  5. 《Table 3 Quality assessment of included case-control studies according to NHBLI Quality Assessment Tool》2019.07.27
  6. 《表2 压载水引入赤潮生物风险评价指标体系Tab.2 Introduction of ballast water to red tide biological risk assessment indicators》2019.02.01
  7. 《Table 2 Description of studies using a clinical assessment strategy to reduce upper gastrointestinal endoscopies》2019.01.14
  8. 《Table 1 The number of productive fields of rapeseed divided into two sets, A and B, from 2008 to 2017》2019.01.20
  9. 《表1 3组小鼠体质量及肝体比比较Tab.1 Comparison of the body mass and the ratio of liver mass to body mass of mice among the three group》2019.01.05
  10. 《Table 3.Multivariate Linear Regression Model to Evaluate the Effect of Childhood BMI and Parental BMI on Adulthood BMI (》2019.03.20
  11. 《Table 1Toxicity assessment of B.thuringiensis 29.118 to mice by bacterial reverse mutation assay》2019.02.15
  12. 《Table 3Sperm deformity in mice caused by B.thuringiensis 29.118》2019.02.15
  13. 《Table 2 The quality assessment according to the Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOQAS) of each study》2019.02.18
  14. 《表3 白洋表层沉积物中OCPs和PAHs的质量标准评价Table 3 Assessment according to the quality guidelines of OCPs and PAHs in the surface sedime》2018.04.15
  15. 《表3 总目标层 (A) 对于综合评价层 (B) 各相关因子的判断矩阵Table 3 Judgment matrix of total target layer (A) to correlation factors of comprehens》2018.06.01
  16. 《Table 4 Assessment and statistics of single component assessment of shallow groundwater》2018.06.01
  17. 《Table 1 Characteristics of MCP-1-transgenic mice》2018.04.01
  18. 《表2 苯甲酰基脲类杀虫剂对异迟眼蕈蚊4龄幼虫的毒力Table 2 Toxicity of benzoylurea insecticide to 4th instar larva of B.difformis》2018.09.30
  19. 《表3 苯甲酰基脲类杀虫剂对异迟眼蕈蚊成虫的毒力Table 3 Toxicity of benzoylurea insecticide to adult of B.difformis》2018.09.30
  20. 《Table 7–Friability test of formulations with different amounts of binder (to confirm capping-like breakage) :data show n》2018.03.01

随机翻阅

《表7 食品领域2020年度中国商业联合会科学技术奖授奖名单》 《表2 面板数据单位根检验结果》 《表2 主动脉夹层患者的病因分布情况表（n,%)》 《表4 新媒体宣传主流意识形态存在问题》 《表3 logistics多因素回归分析结果》 《表1 开采沉陷预计系统伪代码》 《表2 回归分析的变量与赋值》 《表1 两组患者临床资料比较》 《表5 测量结果：基于双目视觉的三维测量技术研究》 《表4 数据点精度对比：车载LiDAR在城市部件采集中的应用》