《Table 7.The comparison with previous studies for G-ratios.》

《Table 7.The comparison with previous studies for G-ratios.》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Physical parameter estimation with MCMC from observations of Vela X-1》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

As shown in Tables 4 and 5，line flux derived in the present work is systematically lower than that in W06.This ismainly due to two reasons.（1）W06 considered the corrections of interstellar gas absorption in the flux calculation by assuming a hydrogen column density of 6×1021cm-2which corresponds to the density of 1 H cm-3and the distance of1.9 kpc.The flux values listed in W06 were compensated by absorption values，which shower higher values.（2）The contributions of satellite lines are subtracted during our flux calculation.Although there is a systematic difference in absolute line flux between the calculations of W06 and ours，after calculating the G-ratio[2]which is used to estimate the plasma temperature with

图表编号XD0027422300    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.06.30
作者Lan Zhang、Feilu Wang、Xiangxiang Xue、Dawei Yuan、Huigang Wei、Gang Zhao
绘制单位Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences、Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences、School of Astronomy and Space Science, University o
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 3:Comparison of previous reports and the present study on frequency and distribution of decremental responses in p》2018.09.20
  2. 《表2 与其他文献LDO电路仿真结果比较Tab.2 Simulation results comparison of the proposed LDO with previous works》2018.12.03
  3. 《表1 与其他文献BGR电路仿真结果比较Tab.1 Simulation results comparison of the proposed BGR with previous works》2018.12.03
  4. 《Table 1 Comparison on the chemical properties of soil samples cultivated with garden plants for over 3 years and less th》2018.06.01
  5. 《Table 6 Comparison with previous methods based on molecularly imprinting technology》2020.07.10
  6. 《Table 1“Participants,Intervention,Comparison,Outcome and Study Design”approach for the selection of clinical studies fol》2019.12.20
  7. 《Table 4–Comparison of carboxymethyl S-IIPs for this study with other adsorbents.》2019.05.15
  8. 《Table 3–Performance comparison of GC–MS/MS with previously reported methods.》2019.05.15
  9. 《Table 2–Comparison of the major VOCs (ppbv, unless otherwise stated) with previous studies.》2019.05.15
  10. 《Table 2–Comparison of the major VOCs (ppbv, unless otherwise stated) with previous studies.》2019.05.15
  11. 《Table 1 Limitations of previous studies of microRNAs in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) as indicated in four recent reviews》2019.02.01
  12. 《Table 6.The flux comparison with previous studies for Fcont.》2018.06.30
  13. 《表3 与其他相关研究的NO通量比较1) Table 3 Comparison of NO fluxes estimated in this study with those estimated in other similar studie》2018.04.15
  14. 《Table 5Summary of previous studies conducted on revision of bilateral SEMS in malignant hilar biliary obstruction.》2018.10.15
  15. 《Table 2:Comparison with the method in[10]for the number of iterations》2018.12.15
  16. 《Tab.3 Comparison of data of our study and three previous studies》2018.08.01
  17. 《Table 2 Summarized p CO2 results based on the previous and present studies》2018.04.01
  18. 《表7 同铺层厚度下的固有频率比较Table 7 The natural frequency comparison with the thickness of the layer》2018.05.28
  19. 《表1 本文物候结果与其他研究结果的比较Tab.1 Comparison of phenology results in this study and previous studies》2018.09.01
  20. 《表2 现有文献中机动车碳排放因子比较Table 2 Comparison of vehicle CO2 emission factors from previous studies》2018.01.20

随机翻阅

《表4 Livi计值：冲击式水轮发电机组水力过渡过程计算成果探析》 《表1 吡唑醚菌酯微囊载药量和包封率测定结果》 《表1 文献基本特征表：针灸治疗排卵障碍性不孕症的系统评价》 《表3 各参数校准值：国际经济冲击与我国汇率制度选择：基于双目标双工具政策理论的研究》 《表2 变量的均值、标准差及相关系数》 《表3 两组治疗前后炎症因子水平比较(±s)》 《表1 各年龄组患者的b F S H、T及A M H检测结果 ()》 《表1 2组并发症发生率比较[n (%) ]》 《表2 太湖营养盐半变异函数模型及地统计学参数》 《表2 止裂试验结果Table 2 Results of crack arrest tests》