《Table 2Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of PIVKA-II, AFP and a combination of PIVKA-II and AFP.》

《Table 2Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of PIVKA-II, AFP and a combination of PIVKA-II and AFP.》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-Ⅱ versus alpha-fetoprotein in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review with meta-analysis》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
AFP:alpha-fetoprotein；AUC:area under the ROC curve；DOR:diagnostic odds ratio；PIVKA-II:protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II.

Of the 2567 potentially relevant papers，45 were eligible for inclusion in this study according to their titles and abstracts.After reading the full texts，14 more papers were excluded.Thus，31studies were finally included in this meta-analysis.The process of study selection is described in Fig.1.The characteristics of all the included studies are presented in Table 1.

图表编号XD0020455800    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.12.15
作者Hao Xing、Yi-Jie Zheng、Jun Han、Han Zhang、Zhen-Li Li、Wan-Yee Lau、Feng Shen、Tian Yang
绘制单位Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University、Medical Scientific Affairs, Abbott Diagnostics、Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University、Department of He
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 4 Results and accuracy of bayberry tree recognition model》2019.09.25
  2. 《Table 6 Advanced neoplasia and significant colonic lesion detection:Diagnostic accuracy parameters based on quantitative》2019.05.21
  3. 《Table 4 Diagnostic accuracy of 80%Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity reduction at week 14 for the diagnosis of》2019.04.14
  4. 《Table 1.Comparison of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between ELISA and FCIA》2019.02.20
  5. 《Table 2.Diagnostic performance of UT and TSGF for the AL》2019.02.20
  6. 《Table 2.The Sensitivity and Specificity of the Three Molecular Diagnostic Methods Compared with Solid Culture and Specie》2019.03.20
  7. 《Table 3.The Sensitivity and Specificity of the Three Molecular Diagnostic Methods when Combined with Smear Microscopy》2019.03.20
  8. 《Table 2 Calculate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ACD using gonioscopy as the gold standard》2019.02.18
  9. 《Table 4 Calculate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ACA using gonioscopy as the gold standard》2019.02.18
  10. 《Table 3 Calculate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ACV using gonioscopy as the gold standard》2019.02.18
  11. 《表6 供试土壤的诊断层与诊断特性Table 6 Diagnostic horizons and diagnostics of the soil profiles》2018.06.25
  12. 《表2 发动机额定功率及峰值扭矩的仿真与实验值对比Table 2Comparison of simulational and experimental engine rated power and peak torque》2018.06.01
  13. 《表3 两组诊断准确率、敏感度、特异度比较[n (%) , n=120]Table 3 Comparison of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity between two gr》2018.05.28
  14. 《Table 5Comparison of diagnostic performances among cytology, cell blocks, and biopsy.》2018.12.15
  15. 《Table 6Comparison of diagnostic yield between 22 and 25 gauge needles.》2018.12.15
  16. 《Table 4Comparison of diagnostic results of bottom and top slides.》2018.12.15
  17. 《Table 2Comparison of functional liver levels and liver fibrosis parameters in serum.》2018.10.15
  18. 《Table 2Comparison of patients with and without postoperative complications.》2018.10.15
  19. 《表2 光面爆破实施前后作业时间对比表Table 2Comparison table of operation time before and after the implementation of smooth blasting》2018.01.01
  20. 《Table 5 Diagnostic value of serum miR-489 and miR-21 in patients before treatment》2019.10.06

随机翻阅

《表2 两组患者雌激素、雄激素水平》 《表1 样品编号与纺丝工艺条件》 《表4 2种圆柱齿轮加工机床设计方案》 《表2：汽车前方视野校核方法的研究》 《表1 不同血清型多糖工作曲线的拟合系数》 《表3 2种出口形式蜗壳最高效率点比较》 《表2 不同生物体的含水量》 《表5 高原地区儿童尿检白细胞阳性组和阴性组单因素分析结果》 《表2 湖北某高校近5年来文献资源购置经费支出状况》 《表3 两种缓控释尿素释放特性指标》