《Table 3.The Sensitivity and Specificity of the Three Molecular Diagnostic Methods when Combined wit

《Table 3.The Sensitivity and Specificity of the Three Molecular Diagnostic Methods when Combined wit   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《"Comparison of Xpert MTB/RIF, Real Amp, and CPA Tests in Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis"》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

Of the 3，220 enrolled cases，303（9.4%）showed smear-positive results，2 had contaminated culture results，and 512（15.9%）had culture-positive results（Table 1）.The rates of positive results for Xpert MTB/RIF，RealAmp，and CPA tests were 17.1%（551/3，220），18.8%（605/3，220），and 15.7%（504/3，220），respectively（Table 1）.The performance of the solid culture，which was used as the gold standard for this research，may have affected the evaluation of the molecular assay.The culture contamination rate was found to be very low，potentially due to harsh specimen decontamination procedures.This may have decreased the sensitivity of the solid culture that can detect only live bacteria.

图表编号XD0041621400    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.03.20
作者OU Xi Chao、LI Hui、LIU Dong Xin、XIA Hui、MA Xiao Guang、WANG Shao Hua、WANG Sheng Fen、ZHU Yan Kun、ZHAO Bing、ZHAO Yan Lin
绘制单位National Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Diseases Control and Prevention、Henan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention、National Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Diseases Con
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 3 The size, molecular weight, theoretical isoelectric point and hydrophobicity of the six unknown proteins》2018.02.01
  2. 《Table 3 Sensitivity and specificity of variables at week 14 as predictors of long-term mucosal healing》2019.04.14
  3. 《Table 2 Sensitivity and specificity non-invasive test》2019.01.18
  4. 《Table 2 Sensitivity and specificity non-invasive test》2019.01.18
  5. 《Table 4.Sensitivity and specificity of 8 reagents at different cut-off》2019.02.20
  6. 《Table 1.Comparison of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between ELISA and FCIA》2019.02.20
  7. 《表5 f PSA/t PSA诊断前列腺癌骨转移的灵敏度和特异度%Tab.5The sensitivity and specificity of f PSA/t PSA in the diagnosis of bone metastasis》2019.03.05
  8. 《表4 PSA诊断前列腺癌骨转移的灵敏度和特异度%Tab.4 The sensitivity and specificity of PSA in the diagnosis of bone me-tastasis from prostate》2019.03.05
  9. 《表5 MG、DCE-MRI及两者相结合的灵敏度、特异度比较 Tab.5 The comparison of sensitivity and specificity between MG, DCE-MRI and the combinatio》2019.02.05
  10. 《Table 2.The Sensitivity and Specificity of the Three Molecular Diagnostic Methods Compared with Solid Culture and Specie》2019.03.20
  11. 《Table 1 Inherent viscosities and molecular weights of the polymers》2019.02.01
  12. 《Table 4 Calculate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ACA using gonioscopy as the gold standard》2019.02.18
  13. 《Table 3 Calculate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ACV using gonioscopy as the gold standard》2019.02.18
  14. 《Table 2 Calculate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ACD using gonioscopy as the gold standard》2019.02.18
  15. 《表3 3种协同处置技术的优缺点对比Table 3 The advantages and disadvantages of the three co-processing techniques》2018.08.01
  16. 《表3 西区三大片区负荷指标评价表Tab.3 The evaluation table of the load index of the three major section of the western region》2018.04.21
  17. 《表3 3组妊娠母羊及羔羊的体重Table 3 The body weight of pregnant ewes and lambs in three groups》2018.09.20
  18. 《Table 1 Molecular characteristics and properties of the butene-1 homopolymer and random copolymers》2018.11.01
  19. 《表3 储层应力敏感性试验数据表Table 3 The sheet of stress sensitivity test data》2018.04.20
  20. 《表3 预测ILD发生危险因素的敏感性及特异性比较Table 3 The sensitivity and specificity of the risk factor predicting ILD》2018.06.18

随机翻阅

《表3 T2DM血管并发症的多因素分析》 《表2 500例患者所咨询药物问题的分布情况》 《表1 响应面实验的因素及水平》 《表5 英语教师专业发展领域》 《表1 123例患者基本资料》 《表4“匠心”实践教学所需的校内外实训基地设备》 《表4 因子提取阵：老年人精神文化需求分析——以太原市为例》 《表3 不同加工工艺菜粕毒素含量比较》 《表1 函数封装方法：IEC61850多客户端仿真软件的MMS-EASE Lite设计与实现》 《表1 2012-2016年江苏省主要农产品产量》