《Table 1 Empirical fitting equations for tree growth process》

  提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式

本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现

《Discussion on Individual Expected Maturity of Populus canadensis Moench》

1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录

1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

A linear equation was obtained by taking the logarithm of the tree growth equations，which was then used to get the values of parameters a，b.The F-test and correlation coefficient R test of the2 parameters were performed[2].Through the tests，the tree growth fitting equations was established（Table 1）.As shown in Table 1，in addition to the fitting equations of tree height and wood value 1，which passed the F-test with the reliability of 90%，the fitting equations for other items all passed the F-test and R-test with the reliability over 99%，indicating that this mathematical model（the empirical fitting equation）was applicable as a whole.All items passed the correlation coefficient R test with reliability of99.9%，suggesting that the fitting equation relationship was established.The maximum time of current annual increment and numerical maturity age of trees by the fitting equations were illustrated with ground diameter 1 as an example.For the equation of average growth rate of trees（current annual increment was completed by the derivation of the function Y （t）in Table 1，and only the extreme point was given in the paper） ，the extreme point tz=4.25a，that is，the current annual increment reached the peak when the tree reached 4 years old，and the peak was a single one.For the equation of numerical maturity age of trees（annual average increment，and only the extreme point was given in the paper），the extreme point tm=8.49 a，so the numerical maturity age of the trees was 8.49 a.In this paper，only the fitting equations for ground diameter were stated，and all other fitting equations were done in the same way.The meanings were all the same for growth fitting equation，tree growth rate equation，tree average growth speed equation，so were the significances of symbols of tz，tm，so the calculation results were given indirectly in the paper.The numerical maturity ages of each item were shown in Table 1.As shown in Table 1，the squares of the indices were doubled compared with the indices，but the accuracies were equal to the F-test values and R-test values.This was caused by the exponential mathematical relationship.In order to compare with the accumulation fitting equation，a fitting equation of DBH square was deliberately established.In Table 1，the values of tnwere the ages at the points of intersections of the curves of current annual increments and annual average increments of the sample wood（the values of wood volume 2 were obtained using the tendency chart of growth curves），which could be used as the actual maturity ages of the tree wood.The tmvalues of ground dimater，DBH 1，DBH 2，tree height and wood volume were close to the values of tn，while the tmand tnvalues of DBH square showed significant proximities to the values of wood volume 2，and so this study was of representative significance.Therefore，it was more suitable to fit the wood volumes using empirical equations.The research results had high reliability.In this paper，the maturity of trees was considered according to the maturity of tree volume.Thus，based on the research results and the needs for production practice，it was more suitable to set the maturity age of accumulation volume as the maturity age of the tree.The fitting results of wood volumes from the calculation of empirical equations were consistent with the fitting results obtained from the parse wood analysis，thereby indicating that the accuracy and applicability of the test were reliable[3].