《Table 3 Quality analysis of excellent sugarcane samples with high sucrose content》

《Table 3 Quality analysis of excellent sugarcane samples with high sucrose content》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Traits of Sugarcane Germplasm Resources with High Sucrose Content》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

We carried out the sugarcane quality analysis on 15 samples with excellent Brix indicator performance.The results were listed in Table 3.In terms of sucrose content，except GT07-104 was slightly low，other 13 samples were 0.6%-10.4%higher than 13.19%of the control group ROC22；the sugarcane juice sucrose content of 14 samples was higher than that of the control group ROC22，the highest was GT07-110 and GT08-898，up to 17.5%；in terms of the purity，except GT04-1001，other samples were higher than the control group.GT07-110，GT08-898，GT10-486，GT08-743，and GT07-636 had higher sucrose content than that of the control group，and also had high juice extraction and purity，thus they were more favorable for the development and utilization of sugar.

图表编号XD00182556000    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.01.01
作者Hairong HUANG、Lin XU、Lunwang WANG、Hui ZHOU、Xiang LI、Yuchi DENG、Yan JING、Shiyun TANG、Fang TAN、Wu XIAN
绘制单位Sugarcane Research Institute,Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences、Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement(Guangxi),Ministry of Agriculture、Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement、Sugarcane Research Institute,G
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 2 Average quality index of samples from different areas》2018.07.01
  2. 《Table 1 Comprehensive performance of main agronomic traits of sugarcane with high sucrose content》2018.01.01
  3. 《Table 1 Comprehensive performance of main agronomic traits of sugarcane with high sucrose content》2018.01.01
  4. 《Table 2 Performance of sucrose content and yield of sugarcane with high sucrose content》2018.01.01
  5. 《Table 2 Performance of sucrose content and yield of sugarcane with high sucrose content》2018.01.01
  6. 《表6 不同灌溉处理土壤质量指数在不同土层显著性分析Tab.6 Analysis of variance of soil quality index with different treatments》2019.01.05
  7. 《表3 各样品定量分析结果Table 3 Quantitative analysis of samples》2018.02.01
  8. 《Table 2 Ave rage wate r quality of six sampling site s》2018.02.01
  9. 《表2 供试品种主要品质性状指标相关分析1) Table 2 Correlation analysis of major quality indexes of sugarcane tested》2018.02.25
  10. 《表3 甘蔗蔗糖分与其他品质性状指标间的通径分析1) Table 3 Path analysis between sugarcane sugar content and other quality indexes》2018.02.25
  11. 《表6 宿根破垄方式对宿根蔗产量与品质的影响1) Table 6 Effect of ridge breaking on yield and quality of sugarcane ratoon crops》2018.02.25
  12. 《表3 整地方式对宿根蔗产量与品质的影响1) Table 3 Effect of land preparation on yield and quality of sugarcane ratoon crops》2018.02.25
  13. 《表2 耕地方式对宿根蔗产量与品质的影响1) Table 2 Effect of tillage models on yield and quality of sugarcane ratoon crops》2018.02.25
  14. 《表4 行距对宿根蔗产量与品质的影响1) Table 4 Effect of row spacing on yield and quality of sugarcane ratoon crops》2018.02.25
  15. 《表5 培土方式对宿根蔗产量与品质的影响1) Table 5 Effect of lay-by on yield and quality of sugarcane ratoon crops》2018.02.25
  16. 《表3 本系统检测的睡眠质量分析结果Table 3 Analysis results of sleep quality by the system》2018.05.01
  17. 《表3 不同地形、产量水平果园苹果品质Table 3 Apple quality of orchard with different topography and yield level》2018.09.01
  18. 《Table 3 Elemental analysis of fresh, spent and HI-regenerated catalyst samples》2018.06.30
  19. 《表3 萝卜种质品质性状检测结果分析Table 3 Basic statistical analysis of the traits related with the quality of the radish germplasm》2018.06.15
  20. 《表5“西润2007”品质分析Table 5 Results of quality analysis of‘Xirun 2007’》2018.03.15

随机翻阅

《表1 评价指标权重：新疆风沙灾害风险评估》 《表3 BC4F5代部分株系表型统计》 《表4 吉布提港糖吞吐量前景》 《表3 3155压力变送器型号与技术要求对照》 《表2 3种柠檬酸载体法中和剂鉴定结果》 《表2 前因变量必要性检验》 《表3 变量的描述性统计相关分析》 《表1 辽西-秦南地区洼陷结构要素表》 《表1 几种盐酸废酸液处理方法比较》 《表1.两组患者疼痛程度比较》