《Table 1Benchmark allocation targets by China and‘‘comparable”2030 Greenhouse Gas emissions allocati

《Table 1Benchmark allocation targets by China and‘‘comparable”2030 Greenhouse Gas emissions allocati   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Are China's Nationally Determined Contributions(NDCs) so bad》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
a) These benchmark allocation targets depend on the chosen allocation approach by other countries [1]；b) China’s announcement of peaking its CO2emissions by 2030 is illustratively quantified by a 35% increase of GHG emissions（see first three columns）.

RM2018 reflects a continuous philosophy of author’s research ideas，with similar finding from author’s previous paper.Table 1shows the benchmark allocation targets by China and‘‘comparable”2030 GHG emissions allocations by other countries or regions depending on the chosen allocation approach by other countries，used by RM2018 for the calculation.It shows if China’s CO2emission increase 35%from 2010 to 2030 by following China’s NDC，comparably，there will be 13%，107%，19%，42%and 30%increase for Japan，Norway，US，Switzerland and EU，and 45%，51%，115%increase for Saudi Arabia，Argentina，India，respectively.This table provides the source of 5.1°C warming.

图表编号XD0036051900    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.03.30
作者Kejun Jiang、Chenmin He、Chenfei Qu、Chunyan Dai、Yifei Zhang、Sha Chen、Pianpian Xiang
绘制单位Energy Research Institute National Development and Reform Commission、College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University、School of Environment, Tsinghua University、School of Management, Chongqing Technology and Business University、Shangha
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table.2 China's commercial vehicles (ex-mini) production by engine type[Source:CAAM,NBS]》2020.11.01
  2. 《Table 1 General Impression of China by Exposure to China》2017.05.01
  3. 《Table 2 General Impression of China by Willingness to Interact with China》2017.05.01
  4. 《Table 2.US-China Trade in Services by Industry (In Billions of US Dollars)》2018.06.01
  5. 《Table 1 Comparative advantage indexes of major crops in Northeast China in 2004-2014》2018.10.01
  6. 《Table A4 Classification of China’s sub-regions by intra-and inter-national carbon emission flows》2020.06.01
  7. 《Table 3 China’s provincial carbon emission targets of provinces and regionsa)》2020.06.01
  8. 《Table 1:China’s Total Poor Populations and Poverty Incidence by Different Standards,1978-1985》2020.01.18
  9. 《Table 3 Estimated deaths and cancer mortalities by geographic areas in China, 2015》2019.01.05
  10. 《Table 1 Estimated new cases and cancer incidences by geographic areas in China, 2015》2019.01.05
  11. 《Table 1 Cancer cellular immunotherapies approved by the Ethics Committee in China》2019.01.03
  12. 《Table 4 Lnc RNAs and target genes targeted by hsa-mi RNA-9-5p and hsa-mi RNA-128-3p》2018.05.18
  13. 《Table 6PREPARE validation results, comparing our results with those published by Uzunoglu et al.[2]and Celik et al.[23].》2018.12.15
  14. 《表3 Qu ECh ERS法猪尿中目标药物的添加回收率和精密度Table 3 Recoveries and precision of target drugs in swine urine by Qu ECh ERS pretreatmen》2018.05.01
  15. 《表2 冻干法猪尿中目标分析物的回收率和精密度Table 2 Recoveries and precision of target analytes in swine urine by lyophilization pretreatment》2018.05.01
  16. 《表2 冻干法猪尿中目标分析物的回收率和精密度Table 2 Recoveries and precision of target analytes in swine urine by lyophilization pretreatment》2018.05.01
  17. 《表2 卫星应用装备太空信息资源配置和需求表Table 2 Space information resource allocation and demand》2018.05.01
  18. 《Table 4 FTAs Being Built by China and the Countries Along the Belt and Road》2018.01.30
  19. 《表2 不同目标下调度方案结果Table 2 Scheduling results by different targets》2018.07.01
  20. 《表1 6 增加目标前后的任务分配方案比较Table 16 Comparison of task allocation scheme before and after increased targets》2018.08.01

随机翻阅

《表1 各规范适用范围：锚杆验收试验研究》 《表8 2001（列）—2016年（行）土地利用类型转移矩阵》 《表5 游离棉酚回归模型方程的方差分析》 《表2 改性沥青AC-20关键参数》 《表3 2组治疗前后肾功能比较(±s)》 《表2 实验主要仪器：包埋纳米铁去除地下水中硝酸盐氮及铬污染》 《表2 两组对象TG和TC水平比较》 《表6 水胶比0.48时不同量减水剂混凝土坍落度、强度及抗渗性》 《表1 煤柱宽度方案：区段合理煤柱宽度的数值模拟与研究》 《表1 正交表L12 (210)》