《Table 3–Cumulative nitric oxide (NO) emissions of each treatment during different periods and their

《Table 3–Cumulative nitric oxide (NO) emissions of each treatment during different periods and their   提示:宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名:随高清版一同展现
《Characterizing nitric oxide emissions from two typical alpine ecosystems》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户?点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户?点击这里登录

The conservative NO fluxes varied between 0 and 5.7μg N/(m2hr)in the NAM and between-0.2 and 28.5μg N/(m2hr)in the FOF,occasionally falling within the negative and positive detection limits(Fig.2a).The gas emissions from the NAM and FOF conservatively accumulated to 56±4 and 208±13 g N/(ha year),respectively(Table 3),with the latter being 2.7 times higher(p<0.01).The conservative emissions during the spring FTP,NGS and GS accumulated to 30±2,27±4 and29±1 g N/(ha year),respectively,in the NAM and to 36±5,106±7 and 103±16 g N/(ha year),in the FOF,respectively(Fig.2b).The emissions in the NAM during any of the periods were clearly significantly lower than those in the FOF(Table3).In addition,the seasonal variation pattern in the NO fluxes also differed between the two ecosystems(Fig.2a).The fluxes in the NAM were more definitive during the spring FTP and GS,relative to those during the other periods.The spring FTP and NGS contributed 35%and 47%of the annual cumulative emission from the NAM,respectively(Table 3).The most intense fluxes in the FOF occurred following the basal fertilization event(Fig.2a).The greater fluxes over the annual mean in the FOF(3.2μg N/ (m2hr)) lasted for 17 d and accounted for up to 29%of the annual emissions.Smaller fluxes occurred following the nitrogen top-dressing or during the spring FTP,compared to those following the basal fertilization.In the FOF,the spring FTP and NGS accounted for17%and 51%of the annual emission,respectively(Table 3).Of the cumulative emissions during the NGS,the spring FTP contributed 77%±5%in the NAM but only 35%±2%in the FOF,which showed a significant difference(p<0.001).