《Table 4–Comparison of thousand-kernel weights (TKW) , kernel lengths (KL) , and kernel weights (KW)

《Table 4–Comparison of thousand-kernel weights (TKW) , kernel lengths (KL) , and kernel weights (KW)   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Variation in allelic frequencies at loci associated with kernel weight and their effects on kernel weight-related traits in winter wheat》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

Eighteen main allelic combinations（ACs）involving all nine loci were detected（Fig.3），and the detailed information for AC classes is shown in Table S3.There were significant phenotypic differences among ACs for three kernel weight-related traits.Allelic combination 6（AC6），including genotypes with high-TKW alleles at all nine loci，had higher TKW（50.42 g）than AC7–AC18（with TKW values ranging from 44.00 to49.93 g），and had significantly higher TKW than AC13–AC18（with the TKW values ranging from 44.00 to 48.34 g）.On the other hand，the AC6 genotypes also had longer KL than other AC types except AC2 and AC3.AC1–AC5 had higher TKW than AC6，and AC1–AC3 had significantly higher TKW and KL or KW.Genotypes at the TaGS5-A1 and TaGS5-3A loci gave similar data for the TKW-related traits.

图表编号XD0029300600    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.02.01
作者Teng Li、Hongwei Liu、Chunyan Mai、Guangjun Yu、Huili Li、Lingzhi Meng、Dawei Jian、Li Yang、Yang Zhou、Hongjun Zhang、Hongjie Li
绘制单位National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences、National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Comparison of 150-day weight between different mink varieties》2018.10.01
  2. 《Table 4 Comparison of flower weight of carnation cut flower under different treatment》2018.02.01
  3. 《Table 2–Comparison of molecular weight (MW) fractions of non-proteinaceous and proteinaceous COM of different algal spec》2019.05.15
  4. 《Table 3 The comparison of body weight, serum TC and TG》2019.02.28
  5. 《Table 4 Comparison of maternal blood plasma AA concentrations among the three groups (μmol/L)》2019.02.28
  6. 《Table 2 Comparison of muscle wet weight and muscle fiber cross-sectional area of ulnar wrist flexor in each group》2019.04.01
  7. 《Table 5–Comparison for the weight loss, degradation ratio and cellulase activities (CMCase) of TC-Y with that of various》2019.04.15
  8. 《Table 1–Analysis of variance of thousand-kernel weight (TKW) , kernel length (KL) , and kernel width (KW) for 200winter》2019.02.01
  9. 《Table 3–Allelic frequencies at loci associated with thousand-kernel weight (TKW) among 200 winter wheat accessions.》2019.02.01
  10. 《表4 籽粒灌浆参数与百粒重的通径分析Table 4 Pfad and regression of effect of grain-filling parameters with 100-kernel weight》2018.10.10
  11. 《表2 两轮专家咨询权重评分对比表Table 2 Two rounds of expert consultation weight score comparison table》2018.08.28
  12. 《Table 1 Comparison of body weight of rats at different time points during the experiment (±s, n=10)》2018.02.25
  13. 《表2 各组瘤重及抑瘤率比较 (±s, n=8) Table 2 Comparison of tumor weight and tumor suppressor rate among three groups (±s, n=8)》2018.05.10
  14. 《表5 3组预测结果与加权观测值残差对比Table 5 Comparison of 3sets of prediction results and weighted measured value residual mm》2018.10.25
  15. 《Table 3 Factor maps, fuzzification method and weighting score used to evaluate the sensitivity of land to salinization》2018.12.01
  16. 《表1 不同大小的卷积核性能对比Tab.1 Performance comparison of different convolutional kernel sizes》2018.05.15
  17. 《表4 权重赋值方法比较Tab.4 Comparison of weight evaluation method》2018.10.28
  18. 《表2 2组瘤体重量比较 (±s) Table 2 Comparison of tumor weight between two groups (±s)》2018.02.20
  19. 《表4 两组病病人血电解质变化情况比较 (±s, mmol/l) Table 4 Comparison of blood electrolyte changes between two groups of patients (±s, mmol》2018.09.10
  20. 《Table 4 Comparison of L2 and L∞error norms for numerical solutions of Example1 at t=1 with=[-128, 128].》2018.10.01

随机翻阅

《表5 4个主成分分析的载荷矩阵》 《表2 模型有效性验证：基于有限元法的高速铁路接触网吊弦动态特性研究》 《表6 2013～2018年中国居民人均粮食消费量（kg)》 《表2 添加不同质量分数NH4Cl和KCl样品的DSC》 《表2 三个模型三个阶段回归分析表》 《表1 三组标本不同状态L2/3节段的ROM值与比较》 《表2 101名新护士中医培训考核成绩[名 (百分比, %) ]》 《表2 两组患者LL、PT、SS比较 (±s, °)》 《表4 炉体散热量：焦炉热平衡测定对节能减排的意义》 《表1 极化曲线的拟合结果》