《Table 2Recall,precision,f1-score,and accuracy rateaof two classification models for the COVID-19,IA
Moreover,as the ITI group was used to remove disturbing factors in this study,it was ignored and not counted by theNoisy-OR Bayesian function in the final step.To retain consistency in the next steps,we further compared the average f1-score and accuracy rate for the first two groups,which were 0.720 and74.0%,respectively.
图表编号 | XD00195686400 严禁用于非法目的 |
---|---|
绘制时间 | 2020.10.01 |
作者 | 徐小微、蒋贤高、马春莲、杜鹏、李旭坤、吕双志、俞亮、倪勤、陈燕飞、苏俊威、郎观晶、李永涛、赵宏、刘俊、徐凯进、阮凌翔、盛吉芳、裘云庆、吴炜、梁廷波、李兰娟 |
绘制单位 | State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, College |
更多格式 | 高清、无水印(增值服务) |
查看“Table 2Recall,precision,f1-score,and accuracy rateaof two classification models for the COVID-19,IAVP,and ITI groups.”的人还看了
- Table 6Recall,precision,f1-score,and accuracy rateaof the export of the Noisy-OR Bayesian function for COVID-19,IAVP,and
- Table 4Recall,precision,f1-score,and accuracy rateafor the COVID-19,IAVP,and ITI groups after voting.