《Table 2 Likert rating responses–overall and by demographics》

  提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式

本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现

《Rethinking the tendering frameworks of construction contractors in the context of a soft systems methodology approach》

1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录

1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

Notes:a) The underlined“not”in Q6 to 9 was added for convenience in this paper；b) Range of interviewee responses to the Likert scale item；c) Average of response ratings from all 25 contractors；d) Public contractors；e) Private contractors；and f) only one

Part 2 of the interviews asked the contractors to rate their views on their tendering procedures on a Likert rating scale of 1 to 7（where“1”represents“strongly disagree，”“4”represents“neutral”and“7”represents“strongly agree”）.Responses by ownership and turnover demographic are summarized in Table 2.The wide range in scores for each question was not unexpected，given the different stages of contractor ITP redevelopment occurring within the individual companies，and suggests diversity in opinions.The variation in ratings was consistent with the more detailed responses obtained in the Part 3 discussions.