《INTERNATIONAL LAW AREAS 5》求取 ⇩

PART Ⅰ THE REALIST DEBATE3

1J.S.Watson （1980），‘A Realistic Jurisprudence of International Law’， The Year Book of World Affairs， 30， pp.265—853

2 Anthony D’Amato （1984—5）， ‘Is International Law Really “Law”？’， Northwestern University Law Review， 79， pp.1293—31425

3 Friedrich Kratochwil （1984）， ‘Thrasymmachos Revisited： On the Relevance of Norms and the Study of Law for International Relations’， Journal of International Affairs， 37， pp.343—5647

PART Ⅱ BEYOND REALISM： METHODOLOGICAL CONUNDRUMS63

4Philip Allott （1971）， ‘Language， Method and the Nature of International Law’， British Year Book of International Law， XLV， pp.79—13563

5 James Boyle （1985）， ‘Ideals and Things： International Legal Scholarship and the Prison-house of Language’， Harvard International Law Journal，26， pp.327—59121

PART Ⅲ THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY RECONSIDERED157

6Thomas M.Franck （1988）， ‘Legitimacy in the International System’， The American Journal of International Law， 82， pp.705—59157

7 Martti Koskenniemi （1990）， ‘The Normative Force of Habit： International Custom and Social Theory’， Finnish Yearbook of International Law， 1， pp.77—153213

PART ⅣRETHINKING THE SUBSTANCE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW293

8 David Kennedy （1987）， ‘The Sources of International Law’， American University Journal of International Law and Policy， 2， pp.1—96293

9 Nathaniel Berman （1988）， ‘Sovereignty in Abeyance： Self-Determination and International Law’， Wisconsin International Law Journal， 7， pp.51—105389

10Surakiart Sathirathai （1984）， ‘An Understanding of the Relationship Between International Legal Discourse and Third World Countries’， Harvard International Law Journal， 25， pp.395-419445

11Daniel W.Skubik （1986）， ‘Two Models for a Rawlsian Theory of International Law and Justice’， Denver Journal of International Law and Policy， 14， pp.231—74.471

Name Index515