《Table 1 The major system influencing the moving out of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau shear lines from 2000

《Table 1 The major system influencing the moving out of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau shear lines from 2000   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《2000-2015年青藏高原切变线统计特征分析（英文）》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

The duration of the various types of shear lines is different.As shown in Fig.4，when the life history was12 h，the number of shear lines was the largest，a total of375 times，accounting for 63.45%，while when the life history was 24 hours，a total of 149 times，accounting for25.21%.With the gradual extension of the life history，the number of plateau shear line shows a decreasing trend，in which the longest duration of the plateau shear line was72 h，only appeared one time，and the shear line was finally removed from the eastern part of the plateau.For the plateau east shear line which was not removed，its life history was similar to that of the plateau shear line.For the plateau east shear line which was removed，its life history was concentrated in the range of 24~36 h，a total of 68removals in the eastern part of the plateau，accounting for78.16%；plateau west only has one shear line removal，the duration was 60 h.It can be seen that the life history of the plateau shear line which was removed was generally longer than that of the plateau shear line which was not removed.

图表编号XD006796700    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.02.01
作者李潇濛、赵琳娜、肖天贵、杨瑞雯
绘制单位成都信息工程大学大气科学学院高原大气与环境四川省重点实验室、中国气象科学研究院灾害天气国家重点实验室、成都信息工程大学大气科学学院高原大气与环境四川省重点实验室、中国气象科学研究院灾害天气国家重点实验室、成都信息工程大学大气科学学院高原大气与环境四川省重点实验室、成都信息工程大学大气科学学院高原大气与环境四川省重点实验室、中国气象科学研究院灾害天气国家重点实验室
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《表2 1 9 9 0-2000年土地利用类型转移矩阵 (单位:km2) Table 2 Transition matrix of the land use types from 1990 through 2000 (unit:km2)》2018.06.25
  2. 《表3 2000-2010年土地利用类型转移矩阵 (单位:km2) Table 3 Transition matrix of the land use types from 2000 through 2010 (unit:km2)》2018.06.25
  3. 《Table 2 Information of sample plots in the Zhonggou River basin in the Loess Plateau of Gansu province》2019.12.24
  4. 《Table 1 Summary of plateau pika behavioral frequencies (occurrences) on the study area, Tibetan Autonomous Region, China》2019.01.01
  5. 《Table 1.The major (%) , trace element and REE (×10–6) data of the samples from WPSP of this study》2019.01.01
  6. 《表1 青藏高原各时段月NDVI变化率Tab.1 Slopes in monthly NDVI during nested periods in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau》2019.02.25
  7. 《附表1 五端直流输电系统输电线路参数App.Tab.1 Line parameters of the five terminal DCtransmission system》2019.02.10
  8. 《Table 1 Major parameters of the gantry beam line》2018.08.01
  9. 《Table 1–The WLA system operating conditions from 2013 to 2016.》2018.11.15
  10. 《Table 2–Energy utilization of the WLA system from 2013 to 2016.》2018.11.15
  11. 《表1 3 各因素影响下套壳料的抗剪强度极差分析表Tab.13 Influence of various factors on the shear strength of casing materials》2018.12.01
  12. 《Table 2 Projected annual maximum daily extreme wind speed on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau》2018.10.01
  13. 《表2 1990—2016年主要机构发文影响力统计Table 2 The influence statistics of the papers of major institutions from 1990 to 2016》2018.06.10
  14. 《Table 1.List of sprite observations in the summer of 2015 from the low-light-level imaging system (SpriteCam) located in》2018.11.10
  15. 《Table 3.Typical impurity line emissions measured with the VUV_20 cm system from HL-2A plasmas.》2018.10.01
  16. 《表1 生境质量影响因素探测指标体系Tab.1 The index system of influencing factors of habitat quality》2018.02.20
  17. 《表1 系统线路参数Tab.1 Line parameters of the system》2018.12.25
  18. 《Table 5 Eigen values, F values and P values obtained from the partial RDAs testing the influence of the significant para》2018.12.01
  19. 《表3 武术专业学生跟随民间拳师习武内容情况Table 3 Learning Content of Wushu Major Students from the Folk Masters》2018.03.15
  20. 《表2 武术专业学生跟随民间拳师习武经历情况Table 2 Information of Experience of Wushu Major Students Learning from the Folk Masters》2018.03.15

随机翻阅

《表9 2019年中国保税区进口排行榜》 《表2 京沪两地社会环境对妇女保健的支撑程度与孕产妇死亡率单因素回归分析》 《表4 施工方案比选：船上湿喷植被混凝土生态护坡技术应用研究》 《表1 故障类型数据：基于深度学习的电力计量检定流水线故障预警技术》 《表2 基于多任务学习的情绪分值回归方法的性能》 《表1 2组患者不良事件发生率比较[n(%)]》 《表2 抽水试验验证：基于测井资料的含水层富水性预测模型：以鄂尔多斯地区营盘壕井田为例》 《表1 各损伤状态对应的损失比Lr》 《表1 二维水动力数学模型糙率取值》 《表1 评价指标的标准物元模型》