《Table 7 Diagnostic accuracy parameters for advanced neoplasia detection based on quantitative faeca

《Table 7 Diagnostic accuracy parameters for advanced neoplasia detection based on quantitative faeca   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《High-risk symptoms and quantitative faecal immunochemical test accuracy: Systematic review and meta-analysis》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
1Values are expressed as percentages and its 95%confidence interval.

Our initial literature search yielded a total of 12657 references.After abstract review，we identified 342 complete papers retrieved for manual searching，yielding 5919additional potential sources of information；of these，81 articles were selected for fulltext review and 14 studies were ultimately considered relevant for our purpose（Figure 1）[17-30].Inter-rater reliability was moderate（kappa 0.58）.Individual unpublished data from derivation[29]and validation[31]cohorts included in the COLONPREDICT study were also used as these patients fitted the inclusion criteria.In total，15 cohorts（13073 patients）were selected for qualitative synthesis.Full details of these studies are shown in Tables 1 and 2，and Appendix 2.

图表编号XD0064289000    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.05.21
作者Noel Pin Vieito、Sara Zarraquios、Joaquín Cubiella
绘制单位Department of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense、Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur、Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Immunology, Faculty of Biology University of Vigo、Department of Gastroenterology, Comp
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 4 Test of fitting accuracy of models of the advanced leaves (n=20)》2018.10.01
  2. 《Table 3.The comparison of clinical diagnostic values for CHr》2020.07.20
  3. 《Table 1 Diagnostic criterion for positive cases of five cancers》2019.11.05
  4. 《Table 6 Advanced neoplasia and significant colonic lesion detection:Diagnostic accuracy parameters based on quantitative》2019.05.21
  5. 《Table 8 Diagnostic accuracy parameters for significant colonic lesion detection based on quantitative faecal immunochemi》2019.05.21
  6. 《Table 7 Diagnostic accuracy parameters for advanced neoplasia detection based on quantitative faecal immunochemical test》2019.05.21
  7. 《Table 4 Diagnostic accuracy parameters for colorectal cancer detection based on quantitative faecal immunochemical test》2019.05.21
  8. 《Table 5 OC-Sensordiagnostic accuracy parameters for colorectal cancer detection (Threshold 10μg Hb/g faeces) estimated w》2019.05.21
  9. 《Table 4 Diagnostic accuracy of 80%Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity reduction at week 14 for the diagnosis of》2019.04.14
  10. 《Table 2 Diagnostic modalities for postoperative urinary retention》2019.01.15
  11. 《Table 2 Diagnostic modalities for postoperative urinary retention》2019.01.15
  12. 《Table 2 Diagnostic modalities for postoperative urinary retention》2019.01.15
  13. 《Table 1 Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma》2019.03.26
  14. 《表1 淡漠综合征诊断标准[7] (diagnostic criteria for apathy)》2019.04.01
  15. 《Table 5.Diagnostic value of different scoring systems for high risk MDS》2019.02.20
  16. 《Table 2.Diagnostic performance of UT and TSGF for the AL》2019.02.20
  17. 《表3 两组诊断准确率、敏感度、特异度比较[n (%) , n=120]Table 3 Comparison of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity between two gr》2018.05.28
  18. 《Table 7 Classification accuracies of the proposed method for the two datasets》2018.12.01
  19. 《Table 2Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of PIVKA-II, AFP and a combination of PIVKA-II and AFP.》2018.12.15
  20. 《表2 不同诊断方法的参数设置Table 2 Parameter settings for different diagnostic methods》2018.05.01

随机翻阅

《表3 常用的数据计算组件特性比较》 《表3 中介模型路径系数参数估计》 《表3 各评价指标的重要性与满意度检验结果》 《表4 区别效度检验：复杂非均质场地条件下考虑桩-土相互作用的核电厂取水构筑物抗震安全分析》 《表1 透明土体岩土特性参数》 《表1 CPU224XP I/O规格》 《表3 两组CINV控制的总体满意度进行比较[例(%)]》 《表8 繁殖猴血液免疫物质的检测结果(g/L)》 《表4 3种钨材料的抗拉强度与硬度》 《表2 超材料领域研究主题知识基因组合》