《Table 4.Pairwise FST values among four populations of Thrips palmi.》

《Table 4.Pairwise FST values among four populations of Thrips palmi.》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Genome-wide developed microsatellite markers for the melon thrips Thrips palmi Karny(Thysanoptera:Thripidae)》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

Among geographical populations，FST values ranged from 0.0167 to 0.0867.Value from HNCS and BJDX were higher than those from other population pairs（Table 4）.The STRUCTURE analysis of four geographic populations showed the best number of clusters was two.The three northern populations of BJDX，SDSG and LNAS was mainly composed of one cluster，while the southern population HNCS was mainly composed of another cluster（Fig.2）.DAPC analysis showed that the southern population HNCS and northern population LANS were distantly related to two other populations and all individuals could be clearly divided into different clusters corresponding to their populations（Fig.3）.

图表编号XD0030358300    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.04.01
作者Yongfu Gao、Yajun Gong、Ling Ma、Lijun Cao、Jincui Chen、Min Chen、Shujun Wei
绘制单位Beijing Key Laboratory for Forest Pest Control, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University、Institute of Plant and Environmental Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences、Institute of Plant and Environmental Protection, Beijing
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《表2 3种PTV相互比较P值表Tab.2 P values of PTV parameters among 3 plans》2019.02.25
  2. 《Table 1 P value in Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of metrics among groups》2019.02.01
  3. 《Table 2.Matrix of genetic distances (FST) among populations of Enhalus acoroides calculated by using Arlequin 3.5 (Excof》2019.01.01
  4. 《表5 5个凡纳滨对虾亲本群体间的遗传分化指数Fst Tab.5 The genetic differentiation (Fst) of 5 broodstock populations of L.vannamei》2019.02.25
  5. 《Table 3.Null allele frequencies of the 35 microsatellite loci among four populations of Thrips palmi.》2019.04.01
  6. 《表2 4种算法的去噪与增强效果的定量比较Table 2 Quantitative comparison of denoising and enhancement effects among four algorithms》2018.03.01
  7. 《表3 4种去雾算法的运算时间比较Table 3 Comparison of operation time among four dehazing algorithms》2018.03.01
  8. 《表3 4种型号直升机底层指标取值Table 3 Four types of helicopters bottom index value》2018.05.15
  9. 《表3 云南松种群生命表Tab.3 Life table of P.yunnanensis Population》2018.08.01
  10. 《表5 杭白芷种群间FST和遗传相似度Table 5 FST and genetic similarity among the populations of A.dahurica》2018.03.01
  11. 《表3 4个家系的甲基化类型位点比较Table 3 The comparisons on percentage of DNA methylation type among the four families of pearl oyster P》2018.05.25
  12. 《表2 4个家系的甲基化条带数目比较Table 2 The data of DNA methylation among the four families of pearl oyster Pinctada fucata martensii》2018.05.25
  13. 《表6 克氏原螯虾群体间差异系数Tab.6 The coefficient of variation among P.clarkii populations》2018.05.01
  14. 《Table 2 Polymorphism of the four sub-populations of the Liao River Chinese mitten crab (E.sinensis) at 13 microsatellite》2018.06.25
  15. 《Table 2 Polymorphism of the four sub-populations of the Liao River Chinese mitten crab (E.sinensis) at 13 microsatellite》2018.06.25
  16. 《Table 2 Polymorphism of the four sub-populations of the Liao River Chinese mitten crab (E.sinensis) at 13 microsatellite》2018.06.25
  17. 《表2 4种寄生蝇DNA条形编码序列的基本信息Table 2 Basic information of DNA barcode sequences among four tachinid species parasitic to wild s》2018.02.01
  18. 《Table 3–FSTvalues estimated between pairwise comparisons among three tested populations and among two inbred line groups》2018.08.01
  19. 《表5 不同居群白羊草抗旱隶属函数值比较Table 5 Comparison of subordinate function value of different populations of old world bluestem》2018.01.01
  20. 《表7 油松种群遗传距离和地理距离Tab.7 Genetic distance and geographic distance among populations of P.tabuliformis in Shanxi Province》2018.10.01

随机翻阅

《表1 两组临床疗效对比[n(%)]》 《表3 学生需要线下老师辅导才能掌握的内容》 《表3 轴承内圈内径垂直度随气缸压强变化的数据》 《表3 我国四省市在各变量上的相关关系》 《表1 合同包划分及计价模式清单》 《表1 2014—2018年徐州都市圈成员及全国地级以上城市空气质量优良天数比例》 《表2 研究区作物生育期根系层可容水量S修正经验公式》 《表1 二组患儿麻醉时间和恢复时间结果对比（n=46)》 《表1 2017年末唐山市小微企业人民币贷款利率、浮动区间分布》 《表4 2组健康教育结果比较 (n=41)》