《Table 3 Criteria for assessment of yield variation caused by climate change》

《Table 3 Criteria for assessment of yield variation caused by climate change》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Effect of Climate Change on Yield of Winter Wheat in Jiangsu Province》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

Evaluation model of Spike-grain structureSHANG et al.[26]deem that to assess the impact of meteorological conditions on production objects by the integrating regression method is better.Accordingly，let the evaluation object be Yi（t）（where in i is the spike-grain structure，and refers to the number of spikes，number of grains per spike and thousand-grain weight when i=1，2 and 3，respectively） ，and the meteorological element be Xjk（t）(wherein j is the meteorological factor，and refers to the active accumulated temperature（AAAT），accumulated precipitation（AP）and radiation（RAD）when j=1，2 and 3，respectively；and k is the assessment period，that is，different growth stages（see Table 2 for details），then:

图表编号XD0028006900    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2019.02.01
作者Shun SHANG、Xuhui ZHANG、Zhaotang SHANG、Jing WU
绘制单位National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center、Jiangsu Meteorological Service Center、Jiangsu Meteorological Bureau、Shanghai Ocean University
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 1 Assessment criteria for the sustainable use of water resources in Yinchuan City[22-31]》2018.10.01
  2. 《Table 5 Yield and traits of yield of maize by different treatments》2018.01.01
  3. 《Table 3 Uncertainty in the Preparation Process of Standard Solution Series Caused by Temperature Change》2019.09.10
  4. 《Table 2 Standard Uncertainty Caused by Glass Gauge during the Preparation of Standard Solution》2019.09.10
  5. 《Table 3.Bone diseases or dysfunctions caused by theβ-group of rhodopsin GPCR mutation or deletion》2019.06.01
  6. 《表2 5座水库大坝溃坝后果综合评价指标权重Fig.2 Weights of comprehensive evaluation indexes for dam failure caused by five reservoirs》2019.02.25
  7. 《Table 2 A list of criteria for CCBE》2019.01.03
  8. 《Table 3.Performance assessment of related hematological parameters for diagnosis ofα-thalassemia in males》2019.02.20
  9. 《表3 冰糖橙果实的品质指标Table 3 Variation of fruit quality of bingtang orange collected from different yield orchards》2018.08.25
  10. 《表5 防城江流域底栖动物完整性评价标准Tab.5 Assessment criteria for biological integrity of benthic macroinvertebrates in Fangcheng River B》2018.06.25
  11. 《表3 沙滩岸线侵蚀后退距离 (m) Table 3 The retreated distance of the beach shoreline caused by erosion (m)》2018.09.01
  12. 《表4 地质灾害危险性单因子评价准则Table 4 Single factor assessment criteria of geohazard risks》2018.06.01
  13. 《表5 玻璃量具校准引起的不确定度Table 5 Uncertainty caused by calibration of glass gauge》2018.06.30
  14. 《表3 配制标准溶液过程中温度引起的不确定度Table 3 Uncertainty of temperature caused by the preparation of standard solution》2018.01.15
  15. 《Table 3 Normalized crop yield variation indicated by CV for different years and RV as explained by different MZ approach》2018.12.01
  16. 《Table 3.Cross Checked Classification (CCC) in wing by CVs for assessing power of discrimination.》2018.01.01
  17. 《表3 攀枝花市城市脆弱性综合评价分级标准Tab.3 Grading criteria for the comprehensive assessment of urban vulnerability in Panzhihua》2018.05.01
  18. 《表3 HGS处理工艺对产品密度的影响Table 3 Variation of product density by treatment》2018.04.28
  19. 《表3 产量与品质指标变异范围、均值及变异系数Table 3 Variation range, average index and variation coefficient of yield and quality index》2018.07.15
  20. 《表3 硅酸钠固化土孔隙结构参数的变化Table 3 Variation of pore structure parameters of loess solidified by sodium silicate》2018.02.25

随机翻阅

《表1 Cr12MoV模具钢的化学成分》 《表1 合成微生物体系的应用》 《表3 2个区县应用者职业分布情况》 《表8 全流程的优化结果》 《表1 两组中风后遗症肢体疼痛患者一般资料比较》 《表4 铜-石墨材料磨损表面及横截面EDS分析Table 4 EDS patterns of wear surface and cross section of copper-graphite materials》 《表4 天津通用航空产业与北京、上海的差距》 《表7 三江源区11个县 (市) 水土保持资金投入情况对比表》 《表3 各主要参数因素水平》 《表1 物流管理专业核心课程教学模块表》