《Tab.6 ADF elimination rate of six types of roughage at 0-72 h and parameter analysis of rumen degra

《Tab.6 ADF elimination rate of six types of roughage at 0-72 h and parameter analysis of rumen degra   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Rumen Degradation Characteristics of Six Types of Common Roughage in Khorchin Beef Cattle in Tongliao City》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
%

As shown in Tab.6，the ADF rumen degradability of six types of roughage increased with the extension of culture time.The ADF elimination rates of alfalfa hay and alfalfa block were significantly higher than those of the rest types of roughage at0，6 and 12 h（P<0.05）；the ADF elimination rates of alfalfa hay were significantly higher than those of the rest types of roughage at 24，48 and 72 h，respectively（P<0.05）.The ADF rapid degradation part a of alfalfa hay and alfalfa block were significantly higher than those of corn silage，corn stover，leymus chinensis and rice straw in sequence（P<0.05）.The ED of the ADF of alfalfa hay was significantly higher than those of alfalfa block，corn silage，rice straw，leymus chinensis and corn stover in sequence（P<0.05）.

图表编号XD00183483400    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.06.01
作者Huo Xiaowei、Wuha Gantu
绘制单位College of Animal Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities、Epidemic Control Center of Ongniud Bannar Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Bureau
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Tab.5 NDF elimination rate of six types of roughage at 0-72 h and parameter analysis of rumen degradation model》2018.06.01
  2. 《Tab.4 CP elimination rate of six types of roughage at 0-72 h and parameter analysis of rumen degradation model》2018.06.01
  3. 《Tab.3 DM elimination rate of six types of roughage at 0-72 h and parameter analysis of rumen degradation model》2018.06.01
  4. 《Tab.2 Nutritional component analysis of six types of roughage》2018.06.01
  5. 《表2 醒脑静注射液3种输液0～8 h pH数据表Tab 2 pH values of three types of injection at 0～8 h》2019.02.28
  6. 《表5 3种方法异常值剔除时间和错误概率比较Tab 5 Comparison of outlier elimination time and error rate of 3 methods》2019.01.30
  7. 《表6 6种射流侵彻靶板后的相关参数Tab.6 Relevant parameters of six types of jet penetrating the target》2018.08.01
  8. 《表2 不同体重段的血醇消除速率Table 2 The average rate of BAC elimination in different groups of weights》2018.02.25
  9. 《表3 性别的血醇消除速率Table 3 The average rate of elimination of BAC of different genders》2018.02.25
  10. 《表5 非对称双裂纹在不同Δh方案下的Ⅲ型SIF值影响系数Tab.5 Influence coefficient ofⅢtype SIF at the reference points withΔh for asymmetric double》2018.08.25
  11. 《表4 非对称双裂纹在不同Δh方案下的Ⅱ型SIF值影响系数Tab.4 Influence coefficient ofⅡtype SIF at the reference points withΔh for asymmetric double》2018.08.25
  12. 《表9 对称双裂纹在不同Δh方案下的Ⅲ型SIF值影响系数Tab.9 Influence coefficient ofⅢtype SIF at the reference points withΔh for symmetric double c》2018.08.25
  13. 《表8 对称双裂纹在不同Δh方案下的Ⅱ型SIF值影响系数Tab.8 Influence coefficient ofⅡtype SIF at the reference points withΔh for symmetric double c》2018.08.25
  14. 《表6 对称双裂纹不同Δd方案下的Ⅱ型SIF值影响系数Tab.6 Influence coefficient ofⅡtype SIF at the reference points withΔd for symmetric double cr》2018.08.25
  15. 《表7 6类水溶肥料比较Tab.7 Compa risons of six types of water-soluble fertilizers》2018.10.20
  16. 《表3 相同性别不同体重的BAC消除速率 (mg/100m L/h) Table 3 The BAC elimination rate of the same sex and different weight (mg/100m L/h)》2018.02.20
  17. 《表2 相同性别不同年龄的BAC消除速率 (mg/100m L/h) Table 2 BAC elimination rate of the same sex and different age (mg/100m L/h)》2018.02.20
  18. 《表4 BAC消除速率与各因素的相关性分析Table 4 Correlation analysis of BAC elimination rate and various factors》2018.02.20
  19. 《表6 最大升压速率时的拟合方程及方差分析Tab.6 Fitting equation and variance analysis at the maximum rate of pressure rise》2018.12.25
  20. 《Table 2 Resistance rating of six improved maize varieties using mean score of damage parameters》2018.12.25

随机翻阅

《表2 失重率、吸水率、上载率间的Pearson检验(N=36)》 《表2-志愿者希望组织为防疫服务提供的保障（单选）》 《表3 LM检验结果：国际油价与人民币汇率的非对称溢出效应研究——基于VEC-BEKK-GARCH模型》 《表2 南澳近海水体冬春季环境因子的变化》 《表3 欧浦智网对子公司的担保明细》 《表4 遵义市“旅游-新型城镇化”系统耦合协调度时间演化表》 《表7:2007—2016年每股股利统计表》 《表1 甜高粱秆汁在不同分子筛上的转化a》 《表7 国家政策对毕业生农村基层就业的影响》 《表2 四种光谱分析技术的优缺点分析》