《Table 4 The heavy oil cracking performance of different catalysts》
本系列图表出处文件名:随高清版一同展现
《Research on Catalytic Cracking Performance Improvement of Waste FCC Catalyst by Magnesium Modification》
1) The sample was prepared by acid extraction method reported by Wu,et al.[13].
The heavy oil catalytic cracking performance of different catalysts is given in Table 4.It can be clearly seen that the catalytic cracking performance of R-Cat was obviously improved.Compared with S-Cat,the gasoline yield over R-Cat significantly increased by 3.04percentage points;meanwhile,the yield of undesired products,such as dry gas,LPG,coke,and bottoms,obviously decreased by 0.36,0.81,1.28,and 0.87percentage points,respectively.The above performance improvement of R-Cat could be attributed to the appropriate surface acidity which was greatly helpful to restricting the coking and over-cracking reactions during FCC reaction[22].Furthermore,for comparison,the regeneration of waste FCC catalyst was also conducted using the traditional acid extraction method.As shown in Table 4,in contrast with R-Cat prepared by our regeneration method,although the conversion over the conventionally regenerated waste FCC catalyst used in the comparison tests increased,the gasoline yield obviously decreased by 5.1 percentage points with a distinct increase of undesired products,such as dry gas,LPG,and coke,indicating to the superior effect of our regeneration method.
图表编号 | XD0011301700 严禁用于非法目的 |
---|---|
绘制时间 | 2018.06.30 |
作者 | Yuan Chengyuan、Tan Zhengguo、Pan Zhishuang、Zhang Haitao、Gao Xionghou |
绘制单位 | Lanzhou Petrochemical Research Center,Petrochemical Research Institute,PetroChina、Lanzhou Petrochemical Research Center,Petrochemical Research Institute,PetroChina、Lanzhou Petrochemical Research Center,Petrochemical Research Institute,PetroChina、Lanzhou P |
更多格式 | 高清、无水印(增值服务) |
查看“Table 4 The heavy oil cracking performance of different catalysts”的人还看了
- Table 4 The values of performance criteria for GIUH and GcIUH models different rainfall-runoff events
- Table 2.Distribution of heavy mineral assemblages in different sedimentary areas of the southern Junggar Basin.