《Table 7 Comparison of the overall performance of RHC-5and RT-5 catalysts》

《Table 7 Comparison of the overall performance of RHC-5and RT-5 catalysts》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Development and Application of Hydrocracking Catalysts RHC-1/RHC-5 for Maximizing High Quality Chemical Raw Materials Yield》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

The preparation of the RHC-5 catalyst is similar to that of the RHC-1 catalyst，and the main difference is that the RHC-5 catalyst has more acidity as compared to the RHC-1 catalyst，with the bench-scale evaluation results presented in Table 7.

图表编号XD0011300500    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.06.30
作者Mao Yichao、Nie Hong、Li Mingfeng、Hu Zhihai、Zhao Guangle、Zhao Yang
绘制单位SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Processing、SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Processing、SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Processing、SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Processing、SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Processing、
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《表1 不同评价方法的总体性能比较Tab.1 The overall performance comparison of different evaluation methods》2019.01.15
  2. 《Table 1 The analytical performance of ZnO-rGrO-PB/MCPE in comparison with different electrodes》2019.02.01
  3. 《Table 4Comparison of the OER performances of various one‐dimensional nanostructured materials.》2019.01.01
  4. 《Table 3Comparison of the HER performances of various one‐dimensional nanostructured materials.》2019.01.01
  5. 《Table 2Comparison of the MOR performances of various one‐dimensional nanostructured materials.》2019.01.01
  6. 《Table 1Comparison of the ORR performances of various one‐dimensional nanostructured materials.》2019.01.01
  7. 《表2 几种硝基吡唑类化合物和常见炸药的性能比较[34, 9299]Table 2Comparison of the performances of several nitropyrazoles and common explosives》2018.09.25
  8. 《表2 试验期间降水观测总体对比Table 2 Overall comparison of precipitation observations during the experiment》2018.06.28
  9. 《Table 10 Comparison of the overall classification accuracies (OA)》2018.12.01
  10. 《Table 2 The performance comparison of ik SVM[42], MRFr2[42], SSMLCNN and MSMLCNN》2018.03.01
  11. 《Table 2 The performance comparison of ik SVM[42], MRFr2[42], SSMLCNN and MSMLCNN》2018.03.01
  12. 《Table 2 The performance comparison of ik SVM[42], MRFr2[42], SSMLCNN and MSMLCNN》2018.03.01
  13. 《表2 四种制棒工艺比较Table 2 Comparison of the four major perform fabrication processes》2018.09.01
  14. 《表4 4种分类算法总体精度对比Tab.4 Comparison of the overall accuracies of the four classifiers》2018.10.25
  15. 《表1 CFAR性能对比表Tab.1 The table of CFAR performance comparison》2018.10.31
  16. 《Table 3 Comparison of the overall performance of RHC-1and RT-1 catalysts》2018.06.30
  17. 《表2 超级电容器在不同模式下老化后的性能比较Table 2 The comparison of performance of the supercapacitors aged at different work modes》2018.01.01
  18. 《Table S1Comparison of the OER performance of the as synthesized coral‐like Ni Fe (OH) x/Ni with other control samples.》2018.11.01
  19. 《Table S5Comparison of the overall water splitting activity for the synthesized coral‐like Ni Fe (OH) x/Ni with several r》2018.11.01
  20. 《Table S2Comparison of the HER performance of the as synthesized coral‐like Ni Fe (OH) x/Ni with other control samples.》2018.11.01

随机翻阅

《表1 3组患者一般资料比较》 《表4 线性范围考察：板蓝根标准汤剂质量标准研究》 《表2 不确定度分量表：高精度低转速标准装置的研制》 《表2 我国围生儿CHD发病率的亚组分析》 《表3 两组治疗前和治疗后1、7、14 d的CSS评分比较(±s,分)》 《表1 冬季某日联合循环电厂机组运行参数》 《表1 材料性能指标：不同轴压比钢管混凝土边缘约束叠合剪力墙的抗震性能》 《表1 不同测试压力结果对比》 《表2 比较不同检查方式的准确性、灵敏度以及特异性[n=90, n（%）]》 《表4 川糖2008-7307与华南54-11的主要工艺性状比较》