《Table 2 Sherwood number for varied values of P r, δt, Sc, σm, δ, E and n whenγ1=γ2=β=M=0.2.》

《Table 2 Sherwood number for varied values of P r, δt, Sc, σm, δ, E and n whenγ1=γ2=β=M=0.2.》   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《"A Numerical Investigation of 3D MHD Rotating Flow with Binary Chemical Reaction,Activation Energy and Non-Fourier Heat Flux"》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录

Table 1 is erected numerically to give comparison with a previous study by Shafique et al.[22]in limiting case and all values are found in an excellent agreement.Table 2represents the trend of Sherwood number against varied values of P r，δt，Sc，σm，δ，n，E and by fixing other parametersλ，β，M，γ1andγ2.It is noticed that Sherwood number showns a declining behavior for P r，δt，E and increasing tendency for Sc，σm，δ，n.

图表编号XD008361100    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.07.01
作者Dian-Chen Lu、M.Ramzan、M.Bilal、Jae Dong Chung、Umer Farooq
绘制单位Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Jiangsu University、Department of Computer Science, Bahria University, Islamabad Campus、Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sejong University、Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Computing, Capital Universi
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Table 2 Results of one-way ANOVA with corrected P values for differences in morphometric variables among O.schmackeri,O.》2020.12.25
  2. 《表2 σc/σp和εc/εp比值Table 2 Ratio value ofσc/σpandεc/εp》2018.07.25
  3. 《Table 1 Raw and adjusted P values of miRNAs for age,gender,AD,and MMSE》2019.08.01
  4. 《Table 10 The performance of landform value extraction for the descriptive text of soil types with the conditional random》2019.02.20
  5. 《Table 1.Number of drifters for the three groups with trajectories through LS during the southwest monsoon period (SWMP i》2019.01.01
  6. 《表3 不同维度的选取在数据库上的m AP值%Tab.3 m AP of different number of varying dimensionality》2019.01.10
  7. 《Table 1.Structures and p IC50 Values of Inhibitors Used for Modeling》2019.01.01
  8. 《Table 2 Numerical findings of Skin friction coefficient for different values of A, R, C, α, M and W e.》2019.02.01
  9. 《Table 3 Numerical findings of Nusselt number for different values of A, βT, α, γ, P r, A*, and B*.》2019.02.01
  10. 《表6 与卫星高度计相比, 8个潮汐模式的分潮振幅误差 (ΔH) 、迟角误差 (Δg) 、潮高均方根误差 (σ) 和潮高相对误差 (r) Table 6 The averagedΔH, Δg, σand r of the 8tidal con》2018.04.01
  11. 《表6 与卫星高度计相比, 8个潮汐模式的分潮振幅误差 (ΔH) 、迟角误差 (Δg) 、潮高均方根误差 (σ) 和潮高相对误差 (r) Table 6 The averagedΔH, Δg, σand r of the 8tidal con》2018.04.01
  12. 《Table 4 Effects (P values) of stubble retention and tillage on the number of species and seed density in the weed seedba》2018.10.01
  13. 《表5 点Z190三种模型沉降预测值比较 (mm) Table 5 Comparison of three kinds of sedimentation prediction values for point Z190 (mm)》2018.04.01
  14. 《表4 点Z181三种模型沉降预测值比较 (mm) Table 4 Comparison of three kinds of sedimentation prediction values for point Z181 (mm)》2018.04.01
  15. 《表2 Monte Carlo仿真3σ值Table 23σvalue of Monte Carlo simulation》2018.06.01
  16. 《Table 1 Optimal values of the parameters as, es for various chosen numbers of samples》2018.03.01
  17. 《表3/Table 3基于北京和伦敦的线段模型, 空间数与半径之间非线性相关性的R方值以及参数a与b The R-square values and a and b for the segment maps of Beijing and Lo》2018.02.20
  18. 《表4 不同温度下的ΔσTiB, ΔσTiC和Δσssc的值Table 4 Calculated values of f1, fd, ΔσTiB, ΔσTiCandΔσsscat different testing temperatures》2018.06.20
  19. 《Table 2 Values of local Nusselt number-θ′ (0) in comparison to Hayat et al.[50]for different values of parametersβ1, β2,》2018.07.01
  20. 《Table 1 Comparison of Local Nusselt number-θ′ (0) for varied values ofλ, βand P r obtained by Shafique et al.[22]in the》2018.07.01

随机翻阅

《表1 两组患者肺部感染率进行比较[n(%)](n=200)》 《表4 两组血清ET和NO水平比较（±s,n=40)》 《表2 两组患者对护理工作的满意度对比[n(%)]》 《表3 各组大鼠Ashworth评分比较[M(QR)]》 《表2 0 传播跨界与品牌知名度回归模型的Anovab》 《表1 比较两组的临床疗效[n(%)]》 《表1 山东省某除草剂生产企业异丙甲草胺生产过程中存在的主要职业病危害因素》 《表5 辱虐管理与员工离职意愿的回归分析模型 (N=236)》 《表1 各组肾AngⅡ、ET含量的变化[n, ±s]》 《表5 不同聚类类别下平台变量的平均值》