《Tab.2 RMS value for response of DCHP suspension》

《Tab.2 RMS value for response of DCHP suspension》   提示:宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名:随高清版一同展现
《Control Research of Dual Chamber Hydro-Pneumatic Suspension》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户?点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户?点击这里登录

The suspension response with the passive suspension system,the classical LQR and the proposed CSFPID,are shown in Fig.9,including sprung mass acceleration,suspension deflection and tire deflection.Tab.2 is the root mean square value of the dynamic response of the DHCP suspension with random road profile.Tab.2 shows that compared to the passive suspension system,the RMS value of body acceleration and suspension deflection reduced by 4 8%and 5 3%,respectively,by using CSFPID;The above values reduced by 3 7.5%and 2 5%,respectively,by using the LQR algorithm.However,the tire deflection,when using the LQR algorithm,had a4 1%increase compared with the passive system,and the CSFPID control was almost the same with the passive system.