《Tab.2 Leaf yield per unit area of Guiteyou 2 under herbaceous cultivation in different seasons and

《Tab.2 Leaf yield per unit area of Guiteyou 2 under herbaceous cultivation in different seasons and   提示：宽带有限、当前游客访问压缩模式
本系列图表出处文件名：随高清版一同展现
《Herbaceous Cultivation Test of Mulberry in Sichuan Sericultural Area》


  1. 获取 高清版本忘记账户？点击这里登录
  1. 下载图表忘记账户？点击这里登录
Note:Leaf area per unit area in the table is calculated by leaf yield per plant.

As shown in Tab.2，the leaf yield per unit area of Guiteyou 2 under herbaceous cultivation increased with the increasing planting density from 2015 to2016，but was apparently higher than that of fist-form Tongxiangqing.The 2-year average leaf yields per unit area of 60 000，9 000 and 120 000 plants/hm2Guiteyou 2under herbaceous cultivation were 9 690，13 995 and 19 230 kg/hm2higher than that of 4 995 plants/hm2fist-form Tongxiangqing，respectively.The average leaf yield per unit area of 120 000 plants/hm2Guiteyou 2 under herbaceous cultivation was up to 37 560 kg/hm2in 2015，2.21times of that of 4 995 plants/hm2fist-form Tongxiangqing in the same year.The average leaf yield per unit area of 120 000plants/hm2Guiteyou 2 under herbaceous cultivation was 5 235 and 9 540 kg/hm2higher than that of 60 000 and 9 000plants/hm2Guiteyou 2，respectively.

图表编号XD00183469400    严禁用于非法目的
绘制时间2018.02.01
作者Yuan Guiyang、Gong Dagang、Wang Shaobai、Cao Ningning、He Xiaoping、Zhu Hongshun、Wu Gang、Xiao Hui
绘制单位Nanchong Silkworm Eggs Farm of Sichuan Province、Langzhong Silkworm Eggs Farm of Sichuan Province、Nanchong Silkworm Eggs Farm of Sichuan Province、Nanchong Silkworm Eggs Farm of Sichuan Province、Nanchong Silkworm Eggs Farm of Sichuan Province、Sericulture Ma
更多格式高清、无水印（增值服务）

相关图表

  1. 《Tab.1 Leaf yield per plant of Guiteyou 2 under herbaceous cultivation in different seasons and different planting densit》2018.02.01
  2. 《Tab.3 Nutritional composition contents of Guiteyou 2 under herbaceous cultivation》2018.02.01
  3. 《Table 4 Value of ecosystem services per unit area in Yarkant River basin》2020.03.25
  4. 《表3 同一种植密度下不同品种间的小区产量差异Tab.3 Yield differences among different varieties per area under the same planting density》2019.02.25
  5. 《Table 1 TESVs per unit area ($/ha per year based on the 2016 value of the USD) (after Costanza et al., 1997)》2019.03.01
  6. 《表2 透水铺装单位面积建造成本Tab.2 Construction cost of permeable pavement per unit area》2019.01.01
  7. 《表1 生物滞留单元单位面积建造成本Tab.1 Construction cost of bioretention per unit area》2019.01.01
  8. 《表1 0 国内外谷物联合收割机单位面积燃油消耗量对比Table 10 Comparison of fuel consumption per unit area of grain combine at home and abroad》2019.01.01
  9. 《表7 不同机型谷物联合收割机单位面积燃油消耗量Table 7Different types of grain combine harvester per unit area fuel consumption》2019.01.01
  10. 《表2 赫章县不同生态系统服务价值系数 (元/ (hm2·a) ) Tab.2 Coefficients of ESV per unit area of different land use types in Hezhang County》2019.02.01
  11. 《表2 赫章县不同生态系统服务价值系数 (元/ (hm2·a) ) Tab.2 Coefficients of ESV per unit area of different land use types in Hezhang County》2019.02.01
  12. 《表2 三种景观中不同地类的单元水源涵养量表 (单位:mm) Tab.2 Water conservation per unit area of different land use types of the three landscapes》2019.02.01
  13. 《表2 干旱影响下不同区域作物单位产量增长率评估模型Tab.2 Evaluation models of the crop yield growth rate per unit area in different regions under》2019.01.01
  14. 《表1 干旱影响下作物单位产量增长率评估模型Tab.1 Evaluation models of the crop yield growth rate per unit area under drought》2019.01.01
  15. 《Table 3 Benefit per unit area and contribution rate to increase of benefit per unit area》2019.02.01
  16. 《表2 不同温度及不同长度膜丝的单位通量能耗Tab.2 Energy consumption per unit flux under different fiber length and temperature》2018.02.10
  17. 《表5 闽三角地区不同景观类型单位面积生态服务价值Tab.5 Ecological service value per unit area of different landscape types in Fujian Delta region》2018.11.20
  18. 《表2 不同树种单位叶面积PM2.5吸附量Table 2 PM2.5absorption quantity per unit leaf area of different tree species》2018.06.01
  19. 《表6 河南县天然草地单位面积营养物质输出量Table 6 The output of nutrition per unit area of natural grassland in Henan County》2018.03.01
  20. 《表2 中国不同陆地生态系统单位生态服务价值表Table 2 The ecosystem service value per unit area of different land ecosystems in China》2018.01.01

随机翻阅

《表1 不同类型合成雾图下去雾结果对比》 《表1 六种强化学习算法在三种参数组合下的实验评估》 《表3 不同菌株对代谢综合征小鼠血脂水平的影响》 《表3 Logistic模型回归方程变量参数估计表》 《表7 最受三大文摘杂志欢迎的图书来源作者前十名》 《表1 两组患者MMSE及ADL评分比较 (±s)》 《表2 干预前后糖化血红蛋白 (HbA1C) 的比较[n (%) ]》 《表1 实施前后安全事件发生情况比较 (例)》 《表1 比较两组患者护理疗效 (n/%)》 《表2 2组患者的临床疗效比较 (n, %)》